Wolves 0 West Ham Utd 2 (15/08/09)Moderator: Gnome Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match threadWhy do Chelsea always,always do that right at the end
Re: Player Ratingsi agree with most of original post, apart from;
jimenez 6, showed a few good runs and passes, but really didn't contribute enough for me and seemed to go missing a little. parker, 6, not his best game, his longer range passing needs to improve, warmed up a bit more in second half, just lacked a bit today, still it is early doors. collins, 6, very solid in the air, did get turned a few times, but unfortunately is one of his faults as a player, tends to get to tight to forwards, allowing them to roll him.
Re: Player RatingsThanks for the feedback guys, all about opinions eh!
I really would like to see Gabbs in for Collins next game though. I would prefer Tomkins as well TBH
Re: Player RatingsSo far rarings put forward 81, 76 and 78.
Average of 78.33 recurring.
Re: Player Ratings
Bit of a risk putting Gabbidon in just now. Personally, I'd wait until a game with not much on it where it doesn't matter too much if we lose and give him 90 minutes in that. Carling Cup tie is actually a perfect opportunity to do that.
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match threadI have now corrected the Premier league table
![]() It is as it should be, your majesty.....
Re: Player Ratings
Or 71.21%
Re: Player Ratings
Really? 76+78+81=235 235/3=78.3333333333333??
Re: Player Ratings
All in the same place please Russ ... we archive the match threads so it's good to finish them with ratings
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match threadOoops 3-0 to Arsenal, joint second!
Re: Player Ratings
Yeah, but that's out of eleven. So divide by eleven and multiply by ten for a percentage figure.
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
Fuppin hell! Lawro sez "Arsenal have talent in abundance with the likes of Tomas Rosicky, Cesc Fabregas and Eduardo, but they are lacking players with real power, which is a concern. Arsene Wenger probably needs a little more time to work out how his team are going to play this season, so I think they will make a losing start at Goodison Park on Saturday" Everton to win 2:1 .......................why is that **** listened too. Still he always brings a smile to me cheeks and venon to me spit.
Player Ratings
this is a great idea, maybe the main kumb site could put a star rating system (eg. Ajax or a simple Javascript one) for each player on the match reports section, or something? It's easy enough to do on blogs. So that all the kumb readers could have a bit of input. Also probably a way of keeping a running total too, or you could just add em all up at the end of the season? Anyway, here's mine: Green - 8, flapped once but had a few superb stops and as usual kept us in the game. MOTM for me. Faubert - 7, had a great attacking game and put in a couple of solid tackles too, on that sort of form the position could be his. Upson - 7.5, solid defence and well-taken goal from the big man. Will be greatly missed if he ends up at city. Collins - 6, seemed a bit off the pace of the match in places. Illunga - 7, defended solidly and got in good attacking positions a few times. Noble - 7.5, great goal and some good forward balls from the lad, was involved in the play a lot. Could have been MOTM. Parker - 7, broke up the play well and got involved in the attack every so often too. Collison - 6.5, was a bit quiet I thought. Dyer - 7, a lot of movement and a couple of good chances. Looked the most likely to score for a lot of the game. Jimenez - 7, good movement from jimi too, seems to be settling in quite nicely. Cole - 7.5, great hold up play as usual from the big man, magnificent passing and movement. Seemed a bit goal-shy though. Spector - 5, gave it away far too regularly, found myself tense every time he was near the ball Stanislas - 7, did some good running and added a bit of an pacy attacking spark to the proceedings. Last edited by King Guy on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:42 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match threadNot sure how to post links but the goals are on 101greatgoals.com
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
In a word... no Mate where did you learn maths?
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
Can't seem to get on their site but I'll keep an eye out, cheers edit: working now but slowly Last edited by Memorial Ground on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
Sorry mate... its been canned already. Blame that despot UTJ !!
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
It's pretty simple, isn't it? Your totals are from eleven scores (for eleven players), so they're not giving a percentage. To get the percentage, you divide by the original sample and multiply by ten, no? It has been a long time since I did maths tbf...
Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread
From my egg chasing days I seem to remember concussion was automatic 3 weeks (could be wrong though, I was usually concussed at the time).
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |