Wolves 0 West Ham Utd 2 (15/08/09)

An archive of match day threads originally posted in the General Discussion forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby ManInTheIronsMask. on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:43 pm

Why do Chelsea always,always do that right at the end Headbanger I suppose the 27 minutes stoppage time helped on this occasion.
User avatar
ManInTheIronsMask.
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 2:10 pm
Location: Bring back the Johnny Lyall's chant.

Re: Player Ratings

Postby curbstrader on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:44 pm

i agree with most of original post, apart from;
jimenez 6, showed a few good runs and passes, but really didn't contribute enough for me and seemed to go missing a little.
parker, 6, not his best game, his longer range passing needs to improve, warmed up a bit more in second half, just lacked a bit today, still it is early doors.
collins, 6, very solid in the air, did get turned a few times, but unfortunately is one of his faults as a player, tends to get to tight to forwards, allowing them to roll him.
curbstrader
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:42 am
Location: los angeles

Re: Player Ratings

Postby Big_Russ on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:48 pm

Thanks for the feedback guys, all about opinions eh!

I really would like to see Gabbs in for Collins next game though. I would prefer Tomkins as well TBH :?
User avatar
Big_Russ
 
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:50 am
Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.

Re: Player Ratings

Postby Big_Russ on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:54 pm

So far rarings put forward 81, 76 and 78.

Average of 78.33 recurring.

:thup:
User avatar
Big_Russ
 
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:50 am
Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.

Re: Player Ratings

Postby Scaloni Is The Messiah on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:55 pm

Big_Russ wrote:Thanks for the feedback guys, all about opinions eh!

I really would like to see Gabbs in for Collins next game though. I would prefer Tomkins as well TBH :?


Bit of a risk putting Gabbidon in just now. Personally, I'd wait until a game with not much on it where it doesn't matter too much if we lose and give him 90 minutes in that. Carling Cup tie is actually a perfect opportunity to do that.
Scaloni Is The Messiah
 
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Paddy O'Hammer on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:55 pm

I have now corrected the Premier league table :raver:

Image

It is as it should be, your majesty.....
User avatar
Paddy O'Hammer
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Re: Player Ratings

Postby Scaloni Is The Messiah on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:56 pm

Big_Russ wrote:So far rarings put forward 81, 76 and 78.

Average of 78.33 recurring.

:thup:


Or 71.21%
Scaloni Is The Messiah
 
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm

Re: Player Ratings

Postby Big_Russ on Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:59 pm

Or 71.21%


Really? :?

76+78+81=235

235/3=78.3333333333333??

:think:
User avatar
Big_Russ
 
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:50 am
Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.

Re: Player Ratings

Postby Up the Junction on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:05 pm

Big_Russ wrote:I thought I would start this thread so that people who have seen the game either on TV or live can put down the ratings for the players.

All in the same place please Russ ... we archive the match threads so it's good to finish them with ratings :thup:
User avatar
Up the Junction
Thinks he owns the place
 
Posts: 36772
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:03 am

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Big_Russ on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:06 pm

:(
User avatar
Big_Russ
 
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:50 am
Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Jameslegend on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:17 pm

Ooops 3-0 to Arsenal, joint second!
User avatar
Jameslegend
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:41 pm
Location: Chelmsford, Essex

Re: Player Ratings

Postby Scaloni Is The Messiah on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:20 pm

Big_Russ wrote:Really? :?

76+78+81=235

235/3=78.3333333333333??

:think:


Yeah, but that's out of eleven. So divide by eleven and multiply by ten for a percentage figure.
Scaloni Is The Messiah
 
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Paddy O'Hammer on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:22 pm

Jameslegend wrote:Ooops 3-0 to Arsenal, joint second!


Fuppin hell!

Lawro sez

"Arsenal have talent in abundance with the likes of Tomas Rosicky, Cesc Fabregas and Eduardo, but they are lacking players with real power, which is a concern.

Arsene Wenger probably needs a little more time to work out how his team are going to play this season, so I think they will make a losing start at Goodison Park on Saturday"

Everton to win 2:1

.......................why is that **** listened too. Still he always brings a smile to me cheeks and venon to me spit.
User avatar
Paddy O'Hammer
 
Posts: 4908
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Player Ratings

Postby King Guy on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:25 pm

Big Russ wrote:


this is a great idea, maybe the main kumb site could put a star rating system (eg. Ajax or a simple Javascript one) for each player on the match reports section, or something? It's easy enough to do on blogs. So that all the kumb readers could have a bit of input.

Also probably a way of keeping a running total too, or you could just add em all up at the end of the season?

Anyway, here's mine:

Green - 8, flapped once but had a few superb stops and as usual kept us in the game. MOTM for me.
Faubert - 7, had a great attacking game and put in a couple of solid tackles too, on that sort of form the position could be his.
Upson - 7.5, solid defence and well-taken goal from the big man. Will be greatly missed if he ends up at city.
Collins - 6, seemed a bit off the pace of the match in places.
Illunga - 7, defended solidly and got in good attacking positions a few times.
Noble - 7.5, great goal and some good forward balls from the lad, was involved in the play a lot. Could have been MOTM.
Parker - 7, broke up the play well and got involved in the attack every so often too.
Collison - 6.5, was a bit quiet I thought.
Dyer - 7, a lot of movement and a couple of good chances. Looked the most likely to score for a lot of the game.
Jimenez - 7, good movement from jimi too, seems to be settling in quite nicely.
Cole - 7.5, great hold up play as usual from the big man, magnificent passing and movement. Seemed a bit goal-shy though.

Spector - 5, gave it away far too regularly, found myself tense every time he was near the ball
Stanislas - 7, did some good running and added a bit of an pacy attacking spark to the proceedings.
Last edited by King Guy on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:42 pm, edited 5 times in total.
User avatar
King Guy
 
Posts: 3164
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 5:28 pm
Location: up north

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby maltab on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:26 pm

Not sure how to post links but the goals are on 101greatgoals.com
User avatar
maltab
 
Posts: 3428
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 1:45 pm
Location: UK

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Big_Russ on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:27 pm

Yeah, but that's out of eleven. So divide by eleven and multiply by ten for a percentage figure.


:lol:


In a word... no

Mate where did you learn maths? :wink:
User avatar
Big_Russ
 
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:50 am
Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Memorial Ground on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:28 pm

maltab wrote:Not sure how to post links but the goals are on 101greatgoals.com

Can't seem to get on their site but I'll keep an eye out, cheers :thup:

edit: working now but slowly
Last edited by Memorial Ground on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Memorial Ground
 
Posts: 5801
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 4:28 pm
Location: On the fence, confusing sh*t with risotto.

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Big_Russ on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:29 pm

his is a great idea, maybe the main kumb site could put a star rating system (eg. [url="http://nofunc.org/AJAX_Star_Rating"]Ajax[/url] ) for each player on the match reports section, or something? It's easy enough to do on blogs.



Sorry mate... its been canned already.

Blame that despot UTJ !! :lol:
User avatar
Big_Russ
 
Posts: 4676
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:50 am
Location: In the "Fit for Life" thread cuddling WG.

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby Scaloni Is The Messiah on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:36 pm

Big_Russ wrote:In a word... no

Mate where did you learn maths? :wink:


It's pretty simple, isn't it? Your totals are from eleven scores (for eleven players), so they're not giving a percentage. To get the percentage, you divide by the original sample and multiply by ten, no?

It has been a long time since I did maths tbf... :oops:
Scaloni Is The Messiah
 
Posts: 9296
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 1:44 pm

Re: Wolves vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Postby OsloHammer on Sat Aug 15, 2009 6:37 pm

Up the Junction wrote:Concussion by the looks of it, should be out for a week tops if so.


From my egg chasing days I seem to remember concussion was automatic 3 weeks (could be wrong though, I was usually concussed at the time).
User avatar
OsloHammer
 
Posts: 6319
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 12:34 pm
Location: Sunny Norway

PreviousNext

Return to KUMB Match Threads

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests