Chelsea 0-0 West Ham Utd (29/01/14)
Moderator: Gnome
- rare as rockinghorse shat
- Posts: 55216
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:43 am
- Location: **** the board
- Has liked: 3 likes
- Total likes: 78 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Mourinho admitted they 'gave everything possible'.
So, with their - let's say - £100m attack/midfield, they gave 'everything'.
You could argue that our team gave a £100m performance
So, with their - let's say - £100m attack/midfield, they gave 'everything'.
You could argue that our team gave a £100m performance
- Ozza
- Posts: 28282
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:41 pm
- Location: Here, there, every f****** where
- Has liked: 943 likes
- Total likes: 2391 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Zimhammer wrote:A totally dominant team failed to convert one of 38 opportunities and this is hailed as tactical genius? 38 - 1 isn't close to parity.
Out of those 38 I don't remember many that hit the post or troubled the keeper, the managers tactics to keep it condensed in the middle and force shots from distance seemed to work well in my eyes.
Not sure what other tactics we could have used against a squad in the multi millions , with some world class talent. If we'd had opened the game up they would have destroyed us
Last edited by Ozza on Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Oldun
- Posts: 8166
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 9:59 am
- Location: living in the past and loving it.
- Has liked: 172 likes
- Total likes: 568 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Zimhammer wrote:A totally dominant team failed to convert one of 38 opportunities and this is hailed as tactical genius? 38 - 1 isn't close to parity.
I think 0-0 is parity.
- Westbourne Bill
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:49 pm
- Location: W Sussex
- Has liked: 130 likes
- Total likes: 332 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Great result but let's be honest, allowing Chelsea to have 38 attempts on goal is not a lot to be proud about, however plucky the defending. Still, watching a smug Sam enjoy his moment was quite amusing.
- Sir_Trevor
- Posts: 4517
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 12:09 pm
- Has liked: 274 likes
- Total likes: 352 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
As was said above, they may have had 38 shots on goal but only 8 on target and several of them straight at Adrian from distance. I didn't feel they particularly threatened us very often.
Kept mainly to hopeful punts from distance. Good, solid defensive display. There have been plenty of games where you come away thinking 'wow, that was lucky!' but I really would not accept that this was a lucky point in any way.
Kept mainly to hopeful punts from distance. Good, solid defensive display. There have been plenty of games where you come away thinking 'wow, that was lucky!' but I really would not accept that this was a lucky point in any way.
- Romford
- Big X
- Posts: 39027
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:16 pm
- Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYyxdmHogLU
- Contact:
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
I was just going to say the same thing...8 shots on target is hardly Rourkes Drift
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Or Chelsea overpaid by £99m !rare as rockinghorse shat wrote:Mourinho admitted they 'gave everything possible'.
So, with their - let's say - £100m attack/midfield, they gave 'everything'.
You could argue that our team gave a £100m performance
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
RE the 38 shots, that included blocked shots. Some of which never made it into the penalty area
Its just another useless stat manipulated by the media, to highlight how dominant the big club were, and disguise the fact they couldnt win against a poorer team
Its just another useless stat manipulated by the media, to highlight how dominant the big club were, and disguise the fact they couldnt win against a poorer team
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Did anyone listen to Talksport's Andy Jacobs today. His expected silly rant about Chelski. Following a repeat of BIg Sam's comments about how he loved to see the irate blue's players and manager having a strop following our great point, he said, 'hope they get relegated and relegated again from the championship and have to play Leyton Orient at the OS with 5000 fans watching. It really got to him, how dare we go there and stop them winning, He is everything bad Chelski stand for.
I don't usually listen to him and his Spurs chum, but switched on just as they started and thought, this could be fun following both their team's results last night.
I don't usually listen to him and his Spurs chum, but switched on just as they started and thought, this could be fun following both their team's results last night.
- Ozza
- Posts: 28282
- Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:41 pm
- Location: Here, there, every f****** where
- Has liked: 943 likes
- Total likes: 2391 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
TonyBooze wrote:Did anyone listen to Talksport's Andy Jacobs today. His expected silly rant about Chelski. Following a repeat of BIg Sam's comments about how he loved to see the irate blue's players and manager having a strop following our great point, he said, 'hope they get relegated and relegated again from the championship and have to play Leyton Orient at the OS with 5000 fans watching. It really got to him, how dare we go there and stop them winning, He is everything bad Chelski stand for.
I don't usually listen to him and his Spurs chum, but switched on just as they started and thought, this could be fun following both their team's results last night.
He's a total cock and moans more than some on here, I even prefer Durham to him, chelski prick,
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Yeah I heard it and had a chuckle to myself, big case of sour grapes. I've also just seen the Sam press conference :lol:TonyBooze wrote:Did anyone listen to Talksport's Andy Jacobs today. His expected silly rant about Chelski. Following a repeat of BIg Sam's comments about how he loved to see the irate blue's players and manager having a strop following our great point, he said, 'hope they get relegated and relegated again from the championship and have to play Leyton Orient at the OS with 5000 fans watching. It really got to him, how dare we go there and stop them winning, He is everything bad Chelski stand for.
I don't usually listen to him and his Spurs chum, but switched on just as they started and thought, this could be fun following both their team's results last night.
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Pot, kettle and black come to mind Mr Mourinho...
Remember this?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 645184.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Remember this?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 645184.stm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- paulthebubble
- Posts: 1132
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 4:48 pm
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
If the special one was truly special, he would had this out on the pitch.
http://www.blackanddecker.com/allproduc ... mmerdrills" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.blackanddecker.com/allproduc ... mmerdrills" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- Doc H Ball
- Posts: 14745
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 5:29 pm
- Location: on parole
- Has liked: 935 likes
- Total likes: 1951 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
If I ran this country, I would make a law to cut off the hands of anyone caught filming on their mobiles at football games.
- carnage
- Posts: 22530
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:22 pm
- Location: KFC
- Has liked: 84 likes
- Total likes: 709 likes
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
They didn't have 38 opportunities. It wasn't like our smash and grab at The Emirates at all.Zimhammer wrote:A totally dominant team failed to convert one of 38 opportunities and this is hailed as tactical genius? 38 - 1 isn't close to parity.
- Fuertehammer
- Formerly Ironwerx
- Posts: 1544
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 10:14 am
- Location: Gets banned a lot
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
We won the lottery wrong.
Damn that worthless unexpected point we gained.
Damn that worthless unexpected point we gained.
- Paddy O'Hammer
- Posts: 11138
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: Dublin, Ireland
- Has liked: 511 likes
- Total likes: 166 likes
- Contact:
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
BBC Mourinho wrong about 19th Century football
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25958046
West Ham line-up - 19th-Century style in the 2-3-5 formation favoured in Victorian times:
Adrian
Collins, Tomkins.
Diame, Nolan, Noble.
Downing, C Cole, Carroll, J Cole, Jarvis.
Thank you for the compliment you d1ck :lol:
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/25958046
West Ham line-up - 19th-Century style in the 2-3-5 formation favoured in Victorian times:
Adrian
Collins, Tomkins.
Diame, Nolan, Noble.
Downing, C Cole, Carroll, J Cole, Jarvis.
Thank you for the compliment you d1ck :lol:
- EastLondonHammer
- Posts: 3142
- Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 10:14 am
Re: West Ham United vs Chelsea: Match Thread
Jose Mourinho's criticism of West Ham's defensive tactics bring three words to mind: pot, kettle and black
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... black.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... black.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;