West Ham Utd 2-0 Queens Park Rangers (05/10/14)

Relive every moment of every first team game since the beginning of the 2005/06 season. Our archive of matchday threads originally posted in the General Discussion Forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Post Reply
User avatar
wizzo_66
Posts: 9639
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:27 pm
Location: Long Live the Boleyn
Has liked: 1 like
Total likes: 32 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by wizzo_66 »

I think we did okay in the 3-1 home league fixture last season. Gave it a good go, got back into the game. Their quality finished us off.

We have little for fear this season with an infinitely better sqaud. Noble and Kouyate likely to be back for this one as well.
User avatar
Romford
Big X
Posts: 39027
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:16 pm
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYyxdmHogLU
Contact:

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by Romford »

Missed Noble hugely...Ok display against a team that will be relegated.
User avatar
Topbre_22
Posts: 745
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:40 am

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by Topbre_22 »

With Downing and Song playing so well centrally, where would Noble fit in? Especially when Kouyate is fit again.

Good problems to have.
pharaoh
Posts: 1990
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:04 pm
Location: North London
Has liked: 3 likes
Total likes: 1 like

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by pharaoh »

orbital wrote:I love the fact that Henry was complaining that his player's are not fit enough!!

Who's f*cking fault is that then you moron?
He also complained that the players were still getting used to playing together, yet we had 7 newbies and they had 4, not including Krancjar who was playing on loan there last season. Remi was also on loan to Newcastle last season so he can't complain about losing him.

Not sure about the costs of the squad as we did spend a bit this year but over the last 3 years QPR seem to have spent a lot on average or over-the-hill players.
User avatar
Romford
Big X
Posts: 39027
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:16 pm
Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYyxdmHogLU
Contact:

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by Romford »

http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/foru ... n-the-game" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:shock:
User avatar
James P
Posts: 16268
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Romford
Has liked: 27 likes
Total likes: 169 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by James P »

pharaoh wrote:Not sure about the costs of the squad as we did spend a bit this year but over the last 3 years QPR seem to have spent a lot on average or over-the-hill players.
On Harry's watch? Never!
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67288
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2491 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

Topbre_22 wrote:With Downing and Song playing so well centrally, where would Noble fit in? Especially when Kouyate is fit again.

Good problems to have.
Indeed. Likewise Carroll and Nolan.

Are we going to sacrifice pace and tempo to accommodate Carroll?
User avatar
RM6
Posts: 7341
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:00 pm
Location: Depleting. Punishing. Destroying.

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by RM6 »

When they're relegated by Christmas do you reckon we could pillage them early for Caulker and Mutch?
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67288
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2491 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

Mutch looked like he'd been dragged out of a soup kitchen.
User avatar
the pink palermo
Huge noggin
Posts: 45150
Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: The Notorious Gate B @LS
Has liked: 807 likes
Total likes: 3020 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by the pink palermo »

bubbles1966 wrote:Mutch looked like he'd been dragged out of a soup kitchen.
Several of the rest looked like they had been on the special offers at Burger King .

They're doomed .Guns for hire all over the place, none with any affinity with the club they play for , the fans that pay at the gate or even the city in which they work .
User avatar
Aceface
Posts: 16443
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:01 am
Location: Blighty
Has liked: 375 likes
Total likes: 1471 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by Aceface »

There's almost a skeleton traditional Allardyce squad now that we appear to have outgrown - Jarvis, Carroll, Nolan, Collins and JoB. None of those have an obvious way back in.

Add Morrison and Vaz Te to that and, potentially, you're looking at a not insignificant addition to next season's transfer kitty through player sales for a change.
User avatar
NW5hammer
Posts: 860
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:22 pm

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by NW5hammer »

Romford wrote:http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/foru ... n-the-game" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

:shock:
Yes they are deluded but I can see why. If that Austin chance from the Zamora cross had gone in then it would have been a very different game. We weren't creating a load of chances and we weren't hogging possession. They have much more quality than, say, Burnley (which isn't saying much) but at the moment there is no pace and not a lot of fight.
User avatar
DaveWHU1964
Posts: 14882
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:14 am
Has liked: 1296 likes
Total likes: 684 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by DaveWHU1964 »

the pink palermo wrote:They're doomed .Guns for hire all over the place, none with any affinity with the club they play for , the fans that pay at the gate or even the city in which they work .
They're following the exact same strategy of two years ago and it's probably going to end the exact same way. And deservedly so. History repeats itself when people are too stupid to learn from their expensive mistakes.
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67288
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2491 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

Aceface wrote:There's almost a skeleton traditional Allardyce squad now that we appear to have outgrown - Jarvis, Carroll, Nolan, Collins and JoB. None of those have an obvious way back in.

Add Morrison and Vaz Te to that and, potentially, you're looking at a not insignificant addition to next season's transfer kitty through player sales for a change.
The Death of Plan A?

Retaining Song and Jenkinson would cost next year's transfer budget.
User avatar
Aceface
Posts: 16443
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:01 am
Location: Blighty
Has liked: 375 likes
Total likes: 1471 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by Aceface »

Exactly. Converting loans into permanent signings can be a bit like being given cash in advance - it can lead to a speed bump when it's payment time. It's what happened to us with Carroll's second season with most of the kitty going on him, and it seems to be what's happening at Everton this season with Barry and Lukaku. We're going to need to add and not just consolidate - selling Carroll might be the type of hard decision that needs to be considered to allow us to do that
User avatar
DaveWHU1964
Posts: 14882
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:14 am
Has liked: 1296 likes
Total likes: 684 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by DaveWHU1964 »

Aceface wrote:There's almost a skeleton traditional Allardyce squad now that we appear to have outgrown - Jarvis, Carroll, Nolan, Collins and JoB. None of those have an obvious way back in.

Add Morrison and Vaz Te to that and, potentially, you're looking at a not insignificant addition to next season's transfer kitty through player sales for a change.
Or (and with one or two exceptions) we keep most of these very good players and have a squad the envy of at least half the league and the team isn't diminished even if we have two or three out.
User avatar
RM6
Posts: 7341
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:00 pm
Location: Depleting. Punishing. Destroying.

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by RM6 »

bubbles1966 wrote: Retaining Song and Jenkinson would cost next year's transfer budget.
If the pair of them cost more than £10 million in fees I'll be surprised.

Wages however...
User avatar
bubbles1966
Posts: 67288
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
Has liked: 2491 likes
Total likes: 4396 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by bubbles1966 »

RM6 wrote: If the pair of them cost more than £10 million in fees I'll be surprised.

Wages however...
£10 million for the pair would be as big a steal as Downing for £5-6 million.
User avatar
Topbre_22
Posts: 745
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:40 am

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by Topbre_22 »

Was good to see Jenkinson raiding down the right for 90mins. Means we didnt have to waste a sub on Demel who always needs to come off at 60mins. Hopefully we can sign him on a permanent basis.
User avatar
Aceface
Posts: 16443
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 11:01 am
Location: Blighty
Has liked: 375 likes
Total likes: 1471 likes

Re: West Ham United v Queens Park Rangers: match thread

Post by Aceface »

There's an element of sunk costs theory that might come into play with Carroll and make the thought of selling him not be considered, which is understandable but I'm not sure how sound a basis that is though with such a long, expensive contract still to run.

Funnily enough, loaning him out for a year might be a good option if he doesn't get much game time this season - let someone else play him into form while covering his wages. I've still not got a real clue how good or bad he is...
Post Reply