Southampton 0-0 West Ham Utd (11/02/15)
Moderator: Gnome
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Only thing I fear about appealing the red card is that the FA would have to admit their ref made a mistake. Let's be honest, they don't like to do that too often do they, regardless of common sense,
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Few weeks ago people was moaning he was in the team over the Sakho and Valencia partnershipironsonthebrain wrote:A good away point no question....
BUT
Adrian sent off - and if his appeal is unsuccessful that clown Jaaskelainen back in the team!
Carroll injured AGAIN!
And most tellingly, only one attempt on target all night.
Jussi is only in for 1 game. thats not a big deal, he is still a good keeper.. not great but solid enough
we have a mini injury crisis and still got 2 points off man united and southampton (away) pretty decent
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Jussi is finished as a top flight GK and has been for a few years now.
Let's just hope the mistakes he makes on Saturday don't prove to be too costly.
Let's just hope the mistakes he makes on Saturday don't prove to be too costly.
- Hampshire Hammer
- Posts: 10154
- Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:18 pm
- Location: Somewhere south of sanity
- Has liked: 2429 likes
- Total likes: 77 likes
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
This is the situation in a nutshell, the referee did not make an obvious mistake (as in sending off the wrong player, or handball when in fact the player didn't) in his view the offence warranted a red card; I can't see any way that it will be rescinded.Johnny Byrne's Boots wrote:For the card to be overturned there has to be compelling evidence the referee make an actual mistake.
I'd be very surprised if this was overturned. The FA don't like refereeing the game again.
- Adam 'The Smudge'
- Posts: 8387
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 6:49 am
- Location: It's good but it ain't quite Carling.....
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Clearly Adrian could have belted it upfield but the amount of back passes he received prompted there'd be a different thought process in him.
Our possession and passing were poor with effectively a 3 man midfield and they pressed us well. Not for the first time Song was caught napping and played a poor ball.
Definite sending off imo.
Our possession and passing were poor with effectively a 3 man midfield and they pressed us well. Not for the first time Song was caught napping and played a poor ball.
Definite sending off imo.
- vapourtrail
- Posts: 850
- Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:02 pm
- Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
That's why he kept 11 clean sheets in 38 games during the 2012/13 campaign and 8 clean sheets in 24 games last season for our team.WHUJohn wrote:Jussi is finished as a top flight GK and has been for a few years now.
Let's just hope the mistakes he makes on Saturday don't prove to be too costly.
Always believe in...
- Hammer Laffers
- Posts: 12132
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 5:58 pm
- Location: Yawn
- Has liked: 8 likes
- Total likes: 17 likes
Re: Full side or a few kids?
the pink palermo wrote:
A3 shut, last night, A27 shut, M25 shut .
Well done the Highways agency or whoever is responsible .
I'm glad I wasn't the only one!
- Romford
- Big X
- Posts: 39027
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:16 pm
- Location: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYyxdmHogLU
- Contact:
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
We were attacking down the left with Jarvis and then with 3 back passes from within their half we had the Matador thinking he was Pele....
What bothered me was going from a place to attack to a place of danger...and we do it every game, all in the name of ball rentention. Then with usually go long from the keeper and give the ball back.
What im going around the houses saying is...stop going back to the keeper !!
What bothered me was going from a place to attack to a place of danger...and we do it every game, all in the name of ball rentention. Then with usually go long from the keeper and give the ball back.
What im going around the houses saying is...stop going back to the keeper !!
- Johnny Byrne's Boots
- Posts: 32136
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:19 pm
- Location: Care home dodger
- Has liked: 1787 likes
- Total likes: 2071 likes
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Agree with every word of this.Romford wrote:We were attacking down the left.........
What im going around the houses saying is...stop going back to the keeper !!
In the first half Song and two others dicked about with the ball on the edge of our penalty area, almost teasing them to come and get it. They very nearly did and Adrian's emergency hoof came straight back at us.
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
He averaged over 2 goals per game conceded for Bolton in his last season and then got dropped because of it halfway through for Adam Bogdan too.vapourtrail wrote:
That's why he kept 11 clean sheets in 38 games during the 2012/13 campaign and 8 clean sheets in 24 games last season for our team.
Always believe in...
He's finished and has been for years.
Football fans have very short memories.
- Billydinho
- Posts: 17261
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 9:18 pm
- Location: Piss Making.
- Has liked: 174 likes
- Total likes: 767 likes
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Let's take the claret and blue specs off please gents, it's a blatant red card.
The bloke is in one on one, Adrian dives on it with his arm.
You can argue it all you want, if it was the other way around you'd all be baying for blood if the keeper wasn't sent off.
The bloke is in one on one, Adrian dives on it with his arm.
You can argue it all you want, if it was the other way around you'd all be baying for blood if the keeper wasn't sent off.
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
edited by a moderator
try again without the patronising post
your posting style has been warned before, if you can't abide by the forums rules, you signed up to then go elsewhere
thank you
try again without the patronising post
your posting style has been warned before, if you can't abide by the forums rules, you signed up to then go elsewhere
thank you
- SRXT
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:12 am
- Location: New Zealand
- Has liked: 54 likes
- Total likes: 10 likes
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Muggy team and muggy supporters. Can't stand them. Wish we could have snatched a winner in injury time, but seeing how wound up they are over a 0-0 is almost just as satisfying.
- The Old Man of Storr
- Posts: 32783
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:17 am
- Location: Lost In the Recesses Of My Mind .
- Has liked: 2641 likes
- Total likes: 1747 likes
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
Daft , isn't it ?Romford wrote:
What bothered me was going from a place to attack to a place of danger...and we do it every game, all in the name of ball rentention. Then with usually go long from the keeper and give the ball back.
What im going around the houses saying is...stop going back to the keeper !!
Invariably the ball will go straight to the opposition from our goalkeeper , you may as well pass it to their keeper if you want to keep possession .
- bullyhammer
- Posts: 2051
- Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:55 pm
- Location: One foot in the Med...
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
As people say: "It's all about opinions."Billydinho wrote:Let's take the claret and blue specs off please gents, it's a blatant red card.
The bloke is in one on one, Adrian dives on it with his arm.
You can argue it all you want, if it was the other way around you'd all be baying for blood if the keeper wasn't sent off.
I've said what I think, so won't repeat myself. But just wanted to say that imagining the incident "the other way around" isn't the best way to think about it. When trying to be objective I think the best mind-set to have is that of a complete neutral - somebody who truly doesn't care about either side... as if it were... erm... a Scotty league 3 game or something...
- wizzo_66
- Posts: 9639
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:27 pm
- Location: Long Live the Boleyn
- Has liked: 1 like
- Total likes: 32 likes
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
The bloke wasn't 'in one on one'.
Adrian took it around him and then fell/was pushed on top of the ball.
Even if Adrian isn't fouled, the hand ball needn't result in a red card by the laws of the game.
Adrian took it around him and then fell/was pushed on top of the ball.
Even if Adrian isn't fouled, the hand ball needn't result in a red card by the laws of the game.
- Hockley Hammer
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:54 pm
- Location: Keeping calm and carrying on.
- Has liked: 1 like
- Total likes: 30 likes
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
But surely if Adrian was let off a red card for 'deliberate handball' it will mean every keeper will come out of his area and intentionally catch the ball to kill the game and take a yellow card changing the whole nature of the situation. Denying a 'potential' goal scoring situation.wizzo_66 wrote:
Even if Adrian isn't fouled, the hand ball needn't result in a red card by the laws of the game.
Keepers generally come out to stop the man with the ball, his options are limited outside of the area so he takes a chance using his hands. I can see why he was sent off for falling on top of the ball and holding on to it outside the area.
The contact before that does make a difference, but I don't see how that can affect the red card as it wasn't given.
Bullyhammer, take West Ham out of the equation, I see a keeper in a tussle with a forward, possibly fouled who then falls on the ball outside the area and basically picks the ball up to kill the game.
Deliberate intentional handball. why did he do it? to stop the opposition player getting the ball. I can certainly see why a ref would give a red card.
- Yea Why Not
- Posts: 16954
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:49 pm
- Location: Chips & Gravy you say? Well you can shove that up your ass
Re: Southampton v West Ham United: Match Thread
wizzo_66 wrote:
Even if Adrian isn't fouled, the hand ball needn't result in a red card by the laws of the game.
I keep reading this but wasn't Adrian last man?