Crystal Palace 1-3 West Ham Utd (17/10/15)

Relive every moment of every first team game since the beginning of the 2005/06 season. Our archive of matchday threads originally posted in the General Discussion Forum.

Moderator: Gnome

Post Reply
User avatar
EastleighHammer16
Posts: 7971
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:36 pm
Has liked: 230 likes
Total likes: 1648 likes

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by EastleighHammer16 »

Hampshire Hammer wrote: I'm amazed more hasn't been made of this. Clattenburg insists on a retake for encroachment, then when the second pen kick is taking the same(?) palace player is in pretty much the same position but he allows it. Does the encroachment rule only apply to the first time a kick is taken then?
I think the fact Adrian was a few yards off his line makes up for it. Pens would be retaken about 10 times a game if the referee's applied the letter of the law!
User avatar
Johnny Byrne's Boots
Posts: 32135
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: Care home dodger
Has liked: 1788 likes
Total likes: 2072 likes

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Johnny Byrne's Boots »

Hampshire Hammer wrote: I'm amazed more hasn't been made of this. Clattenburg insists on a retake for encroachment, then when the second pen kick is taking the same(?) palace player is in pretty much the same position but he allows it. Does the encroachment rule only apply to the first time a kick is taken then?
I obviously can't know what if anything goes on in Clattenburg's brain, but the first time the kick was taken, the offending encroacher was way ahead of the rest of them. The second time the encroachers, of both teams it must be said, were pretty much level and perhaps he thought they cancelled each other out and so let it go.

Like holding and shirt pulling at set pieces, if each incident was penalised the game would never finish. There'd be a penalty at every corner and free kick, which would be retaken eighteen times.
User avatar
Beavis Danzig
Posts: 6968
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 9:12 pm
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue
Has liked: 3 likes
Total likes: 733 likes

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Beavis Danzig »

the pink palermo wrote:Zaha switched off completely for Jenks goal, basically a gift - that is not to belittle the pass made by Moses or the run made by Jenks, but if you are Alan Pardew that's what you would be saying to Zaha.
you need to watch that back mate. with the build up it was the most beautiful goal of the weekend from a purely footballing perspective. the whole point of these patient passing build ups is to catch out the one player not keeping up with play and exploit them.
User avatar
Hampshire Hammer
Posts: 10154
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:18 pm
Location: Somewhere south of sanity
Has liked: 2429 likes
Total likes: 77 likes

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by Hampshire Hammer »

Hampshire Hammer wrote: I'm amazed more hasn't been made of this. Clattenburg insists on a retake for encroachment, then when the second pen kick is taking the same(?) palace player is in pretty much the same position but he allows it. Does the encroachment rule only apply to the first time a kick is taken then?
EastleighHammer16 wrote: I think the fact Adrian was a few yards off his line makes up for it. Pens would be retaken about 10 times a game if the referee's applied the letter of the law!
It was more his inconsistency that I was commenting on. A few seasons ago refs had obviously been told to crack down on encroachment, it didn't take long for it to sink in.
User avatar
EastleighHammer16
Posts: 7971
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:36 pm
Has liked: 230 likes
Total likes: 1648 likes

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by EastleighHammer16 »

Hampshire Hammer wrote:
It was more his inconsistency that I was commenting on. A few seasons ago refs had obviously been told to crack down on encroachment, it didn't take long for it to sink in.
Consistency doesn't seem to be a thing when it comes to referees!
mushy
Posts: 18465
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: Kumb Poster of the year 2009
Has liked: 640 likes
Total likes: 841 likes

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by mushy »

EastleighHammer16 wrote: I'm amazed more hasn't been made of this. Clattenburg insists on a retake for encroachment, then when the second pen kick is taking the same(?) palace player is in pretty much the same position but he allows it. Does the encroachment rule only apply to the first time a kick is taken then?

My reasoning was that Clattenburg only asked for the retake the first time because Gayle was so far forward his view of the penalty was obstructed. I kid you not.
Second time Clattenburg moved a bit so he could get a decent view and Gayle was further back.
I also thought players got booked for encroachment, if not they should, its cheating.
whu92
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:28 pm

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by whu92 »

Does anyone know who took over as captain when Noble went off against Palace, I couldn't find it written anywhere.
User avatar
bullyhammer
Posts: 2051
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:55 pm
Location: One foot in the Med...

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by bullyhammer »

whu92 wrote:Does anyone know who took over as captain when Noble went off against Palace, I couldn't find it written anywhere.
Tomka I thought
whu92
Posts: 198
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 12:28 pm

Re: Crystal Palace vs West Ham Utd: match thread

Post by whu92 »

whu92 Does anyone know who took over as captain when Noble went off against Palace, I couldn't find it written anywhere

quote="bullyhammer"][quote[="
Tomka I thought[/quote]
He's the one I thought it might be , I just didn't see it on any of the threads or match reports.
Post Reply