Sunderland 1 West Ham Utd 1 (01/10/05)
Moderator: Gnome
- Rich WHUFC
- Posts: 1692
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:41 pm
- Location: I'm still standing…
- Shminky Malinky
- Posts: 2188
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:42 pm
- Gnome
- Quite eloquent for a garden ornament
- Posts: 14488
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 5:27 pm
- Location: Chislehurst
- Has liked: 1 like
- Total likes: 45 likes
I understand that the player marks in the NOTW are supplied by agency guys rather than the people who actually do the match reports. This would explain why sometimes you read a report that says one thing and the marks section suggests another.Up the Junction wrote:You've got to laugh .. our ratings in the News of the World ...
Carroll 7
Repka 3
Konch 7
Anton 7
Gabbidon 9
Mullins 7
Reo-Coker 8
Yossi 7
Etherington 8
Sheringham 8
Harewood 5
Big Gus ... have a word ...
- If only....
- Posts: 2157
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:14 pm
- Location: Wondering why WHU is not on the thrillseekers list of the most extreme rollercoasters
- Rich WHUFC
- Posts: 1692
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:41 pm
- Location: I'm still standing…
- If only....
- Posts: 2157
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 8:14 pm
- Location: Wondering why WHU is not on the thrillseekers list of the most extreme rollercoasters
- hammerdivone
- Posts: 22276
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 1:55 pm
- Location: Somewhere between here and reality
Obviously the NOTW reporters can't count up to ten then, so they have to farm that bit out *rolling eyeys thingy*Gnome wrote: I understand that the player marks in the NOTW are supplied by agency guys rather than the people who actually do the match reports. This would explain why sometimes you read a report that says one thing and the marks section suggests another.
- delbert
- Posts: 27180
- Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 11:27 pm
- Location: Barking, home of the slowly meandering Prius
- Has liked: 701 likes
- Total likes: 698 likes
Repka did have a mare for most of the match but looked OK for the 10mins before he got subbed, Etherington was *****, those ratings are b*llocks..Up the Junction wrote:You've got to laugh .. our ratings in the News of the World ...
Carroll 7
Repka 3
Konch 7
Anton 7
Gabbidon 9
Mullins 7
Reo-Coker 8
Yossi 7
Etherington 8
Sheringham 8
Harewood 5
Big Gus ... have a word ...
even the old cliche of not being able to string two passes together couldn't sum up that performance, we couldn't string one pass together for most of the game..
still its a point away from home .....
- Amsterhammer
- 70s porn star
- Posts: 18694
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 8:35 pm
- Location: "Woke up this morning, got myself..."
- Contact:
- knutknacker
- Posts: 4091
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: Somewhere in enmity territory
- Rob
- Trying hard to get a tag
- Posts: 4295
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 6:40 pm
- Location: down West Country
Agreed. You want to split the difference and call it a 6?Stevo wrote:Just one save is as good as a goal for me and he made 3 or 4 vital interceptions (including coming for crosses). If it wasn't for him we wouldn't have been in for any points, plus he commanded his defence well in front of him.
6 to 7 for me.
- knutknacker
- Posts: 4091
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 8:54 pm
- Location: Somewhere in enmity territory
- berlinhammer
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 3:01 pm
Carroll 7
Repka 3
Konch 6
Anton 4
Gabbidon 8
Mullins 4
Reo-Coker 4
Yossi 7
Etherington 2
Sheringham 4
Harewood 5
i'd give these marks personally, thought the subs all did well 6s for football genius and bobby, 7 for newton.
think all the 3s n 4s well deserved we were bloody awful, sunderland did very well at ruining our game but they looked very toothless upfront. they were missing arca, stubbs and basila i know but think they'll really struggle. well happy with a point from that, a really shocking performance.
Repka 3
Konch 6
Anton 4
Gabbidon 8
Mullins 4
Reo-Coker 4
Yossi 7
Etherington 2
Sheringham 4
Harewood 5
i'd give these marks personally, thought the subs all did well 6s for football genius and bobby, 7 for newton.
think all the 3s n 4s well deserved we were bloody awful, sunderland did very well at ruining our game but they looked very toothless upfront. they were missing arca, stubbs and basila i know but think they'll really struggle. well happy with a point from that, a really shocking performance.