Aceface wrote:I'm not a fan of kits without a collar ala the Man U one in the opening post. Call me old fashioned but I like a nice collar. Think our uniforms this year are actually pretty decent
****ing ..........uniforms........ :lol:
Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks
Aceface wrote:I'm not a fan of kits without a collar ala the Man U one in the opening post. Call me old fashioned but I like a nice collar. Think our uniforms this year are actually pretty decent
Fire off an email with a short description and a few pics to acole@chelseafc.co.uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;NC Hammers wrote:I got a 1940 French rifle to sell. The condition is pristine because it has never been fired once, but it has been dropped once.
That isnn't Photoshoped, but it's not an Official Nike Shirt either..fmgod wrote:Looks very photoshoped, badge espically.
Fugly ass babyshit - I have no idea what that meansNC Hammers wrote:EPL Home Unis review:
L'Arse: Decent
Chelski: Blue is great, but that stupid red/white collar ruins it
Manure: The collar is crap and the shoulder lines are lame
Brum: Just what the hell is that?
Brom: Good ole fashioned striped shirt, the sponsor logo is a bit daunting
Fulham: Nice classic sh*t, but sponsor logo gets butchered with that "Trade like a pro" corporate line
Blackburn: Hate their two sided shirts since ever
Blackpool: Love that tangerine orange color. Looks fit and fast.
Citeh: I like the sky blue. Nice and neat. nothing outlandish
Liverpool: That red is still a classic
Spuds: Are they trying to look like the French in Bordeaux? Lame
Sunderland: Classic red/white striping. Nice and elegant
Newcastle: I think the black stripes are too thick, but it is decent
Wolves: Fugly ass babyshit yellow/orange
Wigan: Meh
Aston Villa: Trademark violators because they envy our beauty
Stoke: similar to Sunderland
Everton: Meh, all blue and no stripings/accents
Bolton: Trying to be too futuristic. Scrap that and try for a classic approach
Hammers: Not my favorite, but they are going back to old school roots. Away shirts are marvelous.
Any reason? Bar they're not Adidas or Nike? (who have produced more shoite between them than anyone else over the years)DDRS wrote:what a poor choice! I'm glad we have not got them making our shirts.
Under Armour makes quality. Seriously, their stuff holds up very well. Nike makes ****, Adidas is so-so, but UA is the best of all the big name apparel outfitters. But hey, we got Macron for crying out loud. That **** is junk.DDRS wrote:Sp*rs have just signed a 5 yeard deal with 'Under Armour' !? A company famous for making the tops that go underneath the football shirts... what a poor choice! I'm glad we have not got them making our shirts, the spuds I know are going to be fuming... can't wait to see the pics of their new shirts, will be awful... they make the Welsh Rugby shirt for crying out loud!
PS, that French shirt is quality - who thought of that !
10mill a season there getting :shock:DDRS wrote:Sp*rs have just signed a 5 yeard deal with 'Under Armour' !? A company famous for making the tops that go underneath the football shirts... what a poor choice! I'm glad we have not got them making our shirts, the spuds I know are going to be fuming... can't wait to see the pics of their new shirts, will be awful... they make the Welsh Rugby shirt for crying out loud!
PS, that French shirt is quality - who thought of that !
The current shirt is one of the best designs we've had for years.NC Hammers wrote:But hey, we got Macron for crying out loud. That sh*t is junk.
I am not talking design, but thread quality. You think Macron quality is all there?Up the Junction wrote:The current shirt is one of the best designs we've had for years.
west ham15 wrote:French Away shirt which they will use during the 2011/13 period
Bloody nasty if you ask me! lol