Dan Potts

Does exactly what it says on the tin - the forum for football-related discussion.

Moderators: Lost Hammer, bonehead, chalks, goes2eleven, Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus, bristolhammerfc, Wheels, sicknote, Romford, Rio, Gnome, Northern Paulo

Re: Dan Potts

Postby The Gibbins on Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:41 am

Looked like a good 50/50 between Sagna and Potts but he is a unit and unfortunately Potts come off badly. Hopefully he is ok!
User avatar
The Gibbins
Maggot infested twat
 
Posts: 20777
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 12:57 am
Location: Living in Perception

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Bobby Orangeboom on Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:53 am

Lets hope for a speedy recovery.

Any update ?
User avatar
Bobby Orangeboom
 
Posts: 32325
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:10 pm
Location: London, unfortunately.

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Hammersfaniow on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:02 pm

Only update from the club so far, expected to have further scans and be assesed later today

http://www.whufc.com/articles/20130124/ ... 84_3051663
User avatar
Hammersfaniow
 
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:30 am
Location: Essex

Re: Dan Potts

Postby simon hammer on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:20 pm

All the best for a speedy and full recovery Dan, hope to see you back in the team soon :thup:
User avatar
simon hammer
 
Posts: 9340
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 4:03 pm
Location: As Admiral Lord Nelson himself once said - "I am myself a Norfolk man"

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Hambrosia Stu on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:23 pm

Get well soon Pottsy :crest:
User avatar
Hambrosia Stu
 
Posts: 15839
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:03 pm
Location: Deepest, darkest, Devonia

Re: Dan Potts

Postby billybondsballbag on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:23 pm

kayahammer wrote:Looks innocuous enough

hope he's alright.
I know that now's not really the time to get into a debate about it, but it was the speed that Sagna entered the challenge, leading with his arm, that was the problem. Potts was more or less jumping from a standing start, and Sagna was sprinting, leaving Potts to take a forearm smash to the forehead. If a high boot is considered dangerous play, a challenge like Sagna's should be also.
User avatar
billybondsballbag
MILF lover
 
Posts: 9582
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Dirtynorthernbastardville

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Bobby Orangeboom on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:26 pm

billybondsballbag wrote: I know that now's not really the time to get into a debate about it, but it was the speed that Sagna entered the challenge, leading with his arm, that was the problem. Potts was more or less jumping from a standing start, and Sagna was sprinting, leaving Potts to take a forearm smash to the forehead. If a high boot is considered dangerous play, a challenge like Sagna's should be also.


If challenges like that are started to be deemed dangerous, you might as well make the game a non contact sport.

But whilst the game is a contact sport, accidents ( and that was accidental ) will happen.
User avatar
Bobby Orangeboom
 
Posts: 32325
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:10 pm
Location: London, unfortunately.

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Hampshire Hammer on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:41 pm

billybondsballbag wrote:I know that now's not really the time to get into a debate about it, but it was the speed that Sagna entered the challenge, leading with his arm, that was the problem. Potts was more or less jumping from a standing start, and Sagna was sprinting, leaving Potts to take a forearm smash to the forehead. If a high boot is considered dangerous play, a challenge like Sagna's should be also.


My view at the time was that Sagna ran out to win the header and Potts leapt from a standing start, nothing wrong with Sagna. TBH Dan was game, but given the starting positions, he was never going to win the header.

Best wishes Dan, hope you're up and about soon.
User avatar
Hampshire Hammer
 
Posts: 4361
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:18 pm
Location: Somewhere south of sanity

Re: Dan Potts

Postby psychoscoredthelot on Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:57 pm

get well soon pottsy
psychoscoredthelot
 
Posts: 2794
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 3:23 pm

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Bobby Orangeboom on Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:17 pm

In fact i've just watched it again, there is no way on gods earth that was dangerous play, Sagna clearly went to win the ball and did.
User avatar
Bobby Orangeboom
 
Posts: 32325
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2003 3:10 pm
Location: London, unfortunately.

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Hambrosia Stu on Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:33 pm

billybondsballbag wrote:I know that now's not really the time to get into a debate about it, but it was the speed that Sagna entered the challenge, leading with his arm, that was the problem. Potts was more or less jumping from a standing start, and Sagna was sprinting, leaving Potts to take a forearm smash to the forehead. If a high boot is considered dangerous play, a challenge like Sagna's should be also.

A bit harsh, imo

I couldn't help wondering (not seen the replays, so don't know if Sagna looked to see who was coming) if Sagna thought it was O'Brien (who had given Sagna a hard time all game-the one battle on the pitch we were consistantly winning...) who was coming in, so stuffed out an elbow thinking it would go into the strong O'Brien's midrift, but Potts being smaller caught it in the face

I didn't see it at the time (my interest in the game had waned by that point, and I'd switched from watching the stream, to browsing KUMB...) and didn't know what had happened to young Dan for quite some time. I've only see stills of the contact, so I couldn't say how deliberate or dangerous Sagna's challenge was
User avatar
Hambrosia Stu
 
Posts: 15839
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:03 pm
Location: Deepest, darkest, Devonia

Re: Dan Potts

Postby billybondsballbag on Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:26 pm

Bobby Orangeboom wrote:In fact i've just watched it again, there is no way on gods earth that was dangerous play, Sagna clearly went to win the ball and did.
Fair enough, I didn't have the benefit of a replay so I was going on my first impression.
User avatar
billybondsballbag
MILF lover
 
Posts: 9582
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 10:40 am
Location: Dirtynorthernbastardville

Re: Dan Potts

Postby GaryP on Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:28 pm

Bobby Orangeboom wrote:In fact i've just watched it again, there is no way on gods earth that was dangerous play, Sagna clearly went to win the ball and did.



Never even a foul was it. A good hard challenge, both watching the ball. To be fair to sagna once he realised he had caught him he was over there like a shot.
User avatar
GaryP
 
Posts: 4128
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 4:14 pm
Location: Broken Britain

Re: Dan Potts

Postby riksdodgydeals on Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:54 pm

I didnt see it, coverage was pretty poor that I watched, think it was Fox 'soccer' or something but they didnt show a replay or even say what was wrong with him, ie concussion

Hope he gets well soon and doesnt go the way of Ilunga
riksdodgydeals
 
Posts: 1341
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:04 pm

Re: Dan Potts

Postby claretcloggy on Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:08 pm

hope you recover soon young master potts, did well overall so far :thup:
User avatar
claretcloggy
 
Posts: 5626
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:24 am
Location: on the other side of the channel and then drive to the southeast till you come to the lightbulb city

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Hambrosia Stu on Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:15 pm

riksdodgydeals wrote:think it was Fox 'soccer' or something but they didnt show a replay or even say what was wrong with him, ie concussion

The fact that they refused to show a replay, or even focus on what had happened without the replay, suggested they felt it was very serious indeed. It didn't seem that they knew exactly what had happened.
That they were only showing the crowd of medics around him from a long range point of view, doing close up's of the crowd, Sullivan, Brady, anything but the incident, made me really concerned for young Potts

Tbf, the way they treated it was pretty respectful I thought. I was quite glad not to have to see replays
User avatar
Hambrosia Stu
 
Posts: 15839
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:03 pm
Location: Deepest, darkest, Devonia

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Come_On_You_Irons on Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:21 pm

This is totally not a dangerous challenge - if this was deemed dangerous then football would totall become a non contact sport

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LBUSPGLK0U
User avatar
Come_On_You_Irons
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 2:13 pm
Location: Essex bred now residing in Cambridgeshire

Re: Dan Potts

Postby riksdodgydeals on Thu Jan 24, 2013 3:52 pm

by Hambrosia Stu on Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:15 pm

I know what you mean, normally would mean its very serious when they do that but they could have atleast mentioned what had occured, atleast specify head injury rather than broken leg or something
riksdodgydeals
 
Posts: 1341
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:04 pm

Re: Dan Potts

Postby Hambrosia Stu on Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:14 pm

riksdodgydeals wrote:I know what you mean, normally would mean its very serious when they do that but they could have atleast mentioned what had occured, atleast specify head injury rather than broken leg or something

Fair point.
It did seem like they didn't know what had happened. About half way through they made some comment about it must be a head/neck injury as they were putting a collar on him, but even then they were pretty vague
I only found out hours later it was as a result of a collision, rather than the way he fell or something else

Must admit I did think they could have got someone to look back at the replays to figure out what had happened, and tell the commentators so they could then pass that on to their viewers
User avatar
Hambrosia Stu
 
Posts: 15839
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 12:03 pm
Location: Deepest, darkest, Devonia

Re: Dan Potts

Postby riksdodgydeals on Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:24 pm

yea was a bit strange, lets hope the OS keeps us up to date
riksdodgydeals
 
Posts: 1341
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:04 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bikeriron, brun61, fireman, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], HammermanDan, Ozza, pbenjy, Pulls up Trees, rciron, Sawyer, sutts07, TJ_AUS, WalthammerUSA and 72 guests