Late David Gold, Sullivan and Brady
Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
IF (and it’s a big ****ing if) is there any reason why these shysters couldn’t for example charge 0.01% interest instead of 4/7% (delete as appropriate)?
- DaveWHU1964
- Posts: 14873
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:14 am
- Has liked: 1302 likes
- Total likes: 677 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Yes, because that’s what greedy, money grabbing leeches do. For you, me and most others the answer would be no.
- bubbles1966
- Posts: 66967
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
- Has liked: 2436 likes
- Total likes: 4292 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
His main mistake on this particular issue is claiming we have a decent squad that would be doing better if no one is injured.davids cross wrote:So to claim injury as a nuisance and a reason for such a dissapointing season was wrong. I really believe it would have been worse without the injuries .
We have a decent team where the quality or energy drops off a cliff in the absence of the first team and where the manager is starved of options for selection or within games.
A decent squad would stop that happening.
- hammer1975
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:16 pm
- Has liked: 933 likes
- Total likes: 1088 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
I know that some go with the perception that he’s a doddering old fella who gets a bit confused but has the right intentions
I think he’s quite manipulative and disingenuous with his language and direction personally
Wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him
Latest nonsense statement is clearly to influence perception of the squad (and is clearly nonsense as Bubbs more articulately highlights)
I think he’s quite manipulative and disingenuous with his language and direction personally
Wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him
Latest nonsense statement is clearly to influence perception of the squad (and is clearly nonsense as Bubbs more articulately highlights)
- Adrianisournumber1
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 11:03 am
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I saw this article on the sun and I couldn't help but notice the surname of the publisher is it a relation to that muppet West Ham leaker of info
Also I think gold am sulli are right here, they cocked up on transfers before and it clear they don't want to get it wrong and this guy had a disaster at Malaga.
I saw this article on the sun and I couldn't help but notice the surname of the publisher is it a relation to that muppet West Ham leaker of info
Also I think gold am sulli are right here, they cocked up on transfers before and it clear they don't want to get it wrong and this guy had a disaster at Malaga.
- e-20
- Posts: 2835
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 6:01 pm
- Location: London ish
- Has liked: 14 likes
- Total likes: 4 likes
- Contact:
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
[/quote]aaronhammer wrote: In addition, the interest on the Shareholder loans was reduced to 4.0% from 6-7% from 1 April 2017.
The loans from shareholders are unsecured, with interest accruing at 4-6% p.a.
So there is yet another lie from Gold to add to the others, for a year or so ago he picked up an interviewer quite assertively when said interviewer said the rate was 7% Gold interrupted stating categorically it was 6%. Now we see in the accounts the figure is '6 to 7' which is going to be the most positive take they can report. As said elsewhere 'economical with the truth' is a tactic to push the club strategic line has become automatic to them at every turn. It's been so long a process Gold probably doesn't even know the difference these days, though Sullivan is far more calculating I'm sure, while undoubtedly using Gold as the mouth piece to make him feel he still has significance while taking the flak.
- Samba
- Posts: 21811
- Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 3:36 pm
- Location: David Sullivan's least favourite fluffer.
- Has liked: 2484 likes
- Total likes: 895 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Savid Dullivan is a cying lunt.Upton Carp wrote:Fair enough...Just let me know when you require them to be 'un-minced'
- Turns to Stone
- Posts: 15456
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 10:21 am
- Location: Tony Almeida
- Has liked: 229 likes
- Total likes: 1455 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Lack of investment and broken promises.
It’s as simple as that. They have never and will never acknowledge that both of those things lie at their door.
I haven’t listened to the interview just as I haven’t listened to anything that any of th Downey’s or board have said for designed to push away supporters to enable them to sell to a new breed who are happy to watch ‘Manchester City’s’ superstars every week.
f*** em.
It’s as simple as that. They have never and will never acknowledge that both of those things lie at their door.
I haven’t listened to the interview just as I haven’t listened to anything that any of th Downey’s or board have said for designed to push away supporters to enable them to sell to a new breed who are happy to watch ‘Manchester City’s’ superstars every week.
f*** em.
- Ben
- Posts: 14643
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:00 pm
- Location: Overdue warning for being a twat on the rumours thread
- Has liked: 22 likes
- Total likes: 134 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Apart from the stuff in this videocarnage wrote: Masuaku is a shocking defender, and pretty crap at everything else.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
- bubbles1966
- Posts: 66967
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: I'm holding onto nothing, and trying to forget the rest
- Has liked: 2436 likes
- Total likes: 4292 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
4 days from appointment to 'concerns about the managers choices'.Adrianisournumber1 wrote:https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football ... ssion=true" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I saw this article on the sun and I couldn't help but notice the surname of the publisher is it a relation to that muppet West Ham leaker of info
Also I think gold am sulli are right here, they cocked up on transfers before and it clear they don't want to get it wrong and this guy had a disaster at Malaga.
That's a record even for this lot, isn't it?
- e-20
- Posts: 2835
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 6:01 pm
- Location: London ish
- Has liked: 14 likes
- Total likes: 4 likes
- Contact:
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Samba wrote:
"Upton Carp"]Fair enough...Just let me know when you require them to be 'un-minced'
Savid Dullivan is a cying lunt.
Can't wait for that to be un-minced despite there being absolutely no need to actually do so.
- davids cross
- Uncle David
- Posts: 27205
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 10:20 pm
- Has liked: 674 likes
- Total likes: 1289 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Massive outlet down the left side. Can get you up the pitch in a flash when you've been penned deep in your own half. Yeah, he takes a chance near his own area sometimes.....but that's the balance you weigh...carnage wrote: Masuaku is a shocking defender, and pretty crap at everything else.
He's a winger playing at wing back, rather than a left back playing at wing back. Naturally he is going to be better at the attacking part. And he is very, very good at that part. A nightmare when he is playing well. Consistency of performance is his problem (especially his thoughts at the end of a long ball run and dribble) and yes you can aim that at him........but being crap at everything ????....
When Cresswell moved there to cover for his absence it was clear how much he was missed.............and when Masuaku returned that feeling was underlined further.
Frustrating sometimes yes I agree, but crap, no. He has a lot of talent, it shouldn't be dismissed so easily.
- Upton Carp
- Posts: 780
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2015 1:32 pm
- Has liked: 33 likes
- Total likes: 8 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
Top un-mincing! I shall leave the field to your superior talents.Savid Dullivan is a cying lunt.[
- The Old Mile End
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 2:40 pm
- Location: Malcontented keyboard warrior
- Has liked: 8 likes
- Total likes: 91 likes
- hammer1975
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:16 pm
- Has liked: 933 likes
- Total likes: 1088 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
apathy, too much of it around this summer?
Do the ownership feel any pressure at this point - after the last two seasons and four poor windows?
Is there any reason to really believe that they are changing as they promised?
Do the ownership feel any pressure at this point - after the last two seasons and four poor windows?
Is there any reason to really believe that they are changing as they promised?
- warp
- Posts: 14014
- Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:13 am
- Location: I am everything about this site which is wrong... i don't give a toss about WHUFC.
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
not enough, a bit but they think they can scrape through yet again, none whatsoever; respectively.hammer1975 wrote:apathy, too much of it around this summer?
Do the ownership feel any pressure at this point - after the last two seasons and four poor windows?
Is there any reason to really believe that they are changing as they promised?
-
- Posts: 8167
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:24 am
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
This. Gold may not have amassed quite the wealth that Sullivan has, but it's not because of scruples. They are both playing exactly the same game, Gold is just less hands-on and he knows Sullivan will run things exactly how he likes it.hammer1975 wrote:I know that some go with the perception that he’s a doddering old fella who gets a bit confused but has the right intentions
I think he’s quite manipulative and disingenuous with his language and direction personally
Wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him
Latest nonsense statement is clearly to influence perception of the squad (and is clearly nonsense as Bubbs more articulately highlights)
Regarding the new nonsense surrounding the DoF selection, this is a position that potentially wields considerable financial power so it's no surprise that he's under attack. They want to directly control where every penny is going, they will never allow a serious management structure of this kind.
For those lauding Pellegrini, they won't be that bothered if he walks. They always f*** with their managers like this. The fact he has a track record of keeping quiet in the media despite problems behind the scenes may be the biggest attraction for them, it may in fact herald them squeezing even harder in the expectation Pellegrini will just take it. Time will tell.
- S-H
- Posts: 49113
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:05 am
- Location: Kumb Inn
- Has liked: 5738 likes
- Total likes: 9649 likes
Re: Gold and Sullivan ???
This comment was removed by a moderator because it failed to abide by our community standards. For more details, please refer to the Forum Terms of Use. Replies may also be deleted.
- hammer1975
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:16 pm
- Has liked: 933 likes
- Total likes: 1088 likes