Late David Gold, Sullivan and Brady

The Forum for all football-related discussion, including West Ham United FC. Our busiest Forum and the place to begin if you're new to KUMB.

Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks

Post Reply
hammerman11
Posts: 15961
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:01 pm
Has liked: 24 likes
Total likes: 749 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by hammerman11 »

changing managers seems to work for Watford. they played with desire, passion energy and skill against spurs in a lovely old ground with fans near the pitch. all the things we don't have.

MP wont last 3 years maybe not this season. then what ? whilst we are in limbo with the stadium we can never progress or get back to being west ham.

gsb will continue to make money as STs sell out every year and they have the sky money. the only way is to boycott matches large scale and show waste areas of the ground empty.

this will affect the team some may say, but can they play any worse ?
User avatar
Moxy
Posts: 2251
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 2:45 pm
Location: Romford

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Moxy »

Great post TTS
User avatar
Tenbury
Posts: 9324
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 3:28 pm
Location: Too near Kidderminster
Has liked: 729 likes
Total likes: 1228 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Tenbury »

T TS has got it ,as far as I'm concerned.
In fact, in many ways, the crap start to the season has been a blessing, a couple of wins would have masked the true situation as he's laid it out...very much in the same way as the final season at the Boleyn did precisely the same thing.
User avatar
Billy Hunt
Posts: 3217
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2005 10:05 pm
Has liked: 471 likes
Total likes: 364 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Billy Hunt »

Regardless of what side of the bed you woke up on TTS, that is a perfect summing up of the G & S years
User avatar
Johnny Byrne's Boots
Posts: 32353
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: Care home dodger
Has liked: 1852 likes
Total likes: 2106 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Johnny Byrne's Boots »

TTS :thup:
mushy
Posts: 18546
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:17 pm
Location: Kumb Poster of the year 2009
Has liked: 651 likes
Total likes: 871 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by mushy »

hammerman11 wrote:changing managers seems to work for Watford. they played with desire, passion energy and skill against spurs in a lovely old ground with fans near the pitch. all the things we don't have.

?
That's because they have a long term plan and pick their managers/coaches to suit the plan, not the other way round.
Our long term.plan seems to involve a massive panic around January.
As for their stadium, we used to think their gaff was a complete and utter **** hole back in the day, now it's called 'a lovely old ground'.
Is this how far we have fallen?
Hammer.CA
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:37 pm
Has liked: 2888 likes
Total likes: 616 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Hammer.CA »

The owners will love this,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/articl ... ms-up.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Johnny Byrne's Boots
Posts: 32353
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:19 pm
Location: Care home dodger
Has liked: 1852 likes
Total likes: 2106 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Johnny Byrne's Boots »

^^^ Is the tide turning, where the press feel they have more to gain by putting the boot in than by cosying up to Sullivan?

Let's hope so.
User avatar
Swindon Iron
Posts: 215
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2017 5:29 pm
Has liked: 53 likes
Total likes: 20 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Swindon Iron »

Brilliant post TTS, I make you completely right. :thup:
User avatar
PK
Posts: 1889
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 10:35 am
Location: Left Back in the changing room.
Has liked: 1 like
Total likes: 4 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by PK »

I remember watching season review videos in my youth and seeing games like Watford & Chelsea away when the fans were miles away from the pitch in the late 80s/early 90s.

Used to think, thank god that’s not us! How things can change :(
HammerAl
Posts: 5091
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 12:30 pm
Total likes: 397 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by HammerAl »

A damning article. Makes me feel embarrassed, angry and upset. The club is a joke and we fans deserve better.
User avatar
smuts
Posts: 33915
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:28 am
Location: East, East, East London
Has liked: 1533 likes
Total likes: 1493 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by smuts »

Our scouting and training infrastructure is a joke. But under these old tight dinosaurs what do you expect?
User avatar
il_martello_di_genovesi
Posts: 16886
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 12:11 pm
Location: genova è solo blucerchiata.
Has liked: 688 likes
Total likes: 2024 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by il_martello_di_genovesi »

Laughable...

Not sure why Mark Noble thinks it’s not a circus anymore. Looks like we are a Zippo’s franchise thriving in nonsense.

Reading that article makes me angry and worried.
thewhirlwind
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 1:17 pm
Has liked: 3 likes
Total likes: 9 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by thewhirlwind »

Hammer.CA wrote:The owners will love this,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/articl ... ms-up.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
No surprise to hear this. The football side of the club seems very unprofessional which for a multi million pound business is startling.
Need to look at clubs like Brentford who have a clear and cohesive plan and ethos in place for them to compete now and in the future.
User avatar
Puff Daddy
Gone for a Burton
Posts: 42435
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Westham Way
Has liked: 256 likes
Total likes: 1158 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Puff Daddy »

thewhirlwind wrote:
No surprise to hear this. The football side of the club seems very unprofessional which for a multi million pound business is startling.
Need to look at clubs like Brentford who have a clear and cohesive plan and ethos in place for them to compete now and in the future.
Whereas ours is a handful of scouts, a transfer policy of relying on a few tips from a handful of agents punting their players around and a state of the art training ground. I say state of the art advisedly because of its bloody terrible state
User avatar
DasNutNock
Posts: 12302
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 4:41 pm
Location: R Tape loading error, 0:1

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by DasNutNock »

I just find it astonishing that two pornographers who made their fortunes exploiting women, and their mate’s overpromoted daughter are doing a poor job of running a football club.
User avatar
61dicksey
Posts: 15853
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:48 am
Location: Hampshire
Has liked: 580 likes
Total likes: 424 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by 61dicksey »

Embarassng and pitiful from a premier league club , our mob should hang their heads in shame but they have no shame and certain,y have no idea how to run a proffesional football club.
We are ****ed because along with investment in the squad and also the infrastructure they have not the stomache or the will to improve it.
Johnny_C WHU
Posts: 655
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:39 pm
Total likes: 1 like

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Johnny_C WHU »

It breaks my heart to see what we have become, this joke shell of a club which seems to have flipped the values of the club I fell in love with. Being West Ham come with its values and morals and this I felt set us apart from most clubs.

West Ham was never about Champions League or title challenges (although it would be nice), it was about our values and morals, playing good football if we could along the way. We have never been particularly successful, yo-yo club with a flirt of either success or failure along the way.
For a mediocre club we have had to deal with a lot over the years, that is the West Ham way!

The owners who have rocked up and saved this club.... I would rather had administration then face the consequences of their actions to date. We could still have our identity, still being peoples second club.
We have morphed into this entity shaped by two hammers with London written underneath. The badge I don't have a problem with however, I now see it as a symbol of the club we have become... this plastic razzle dazzle joke of a club.

I begrudgingly understand the move to a point, if we are to become a 'bigger' club then we need funding. More revenue and potential investment is significantly important in moving up the table. They however, saw this whole thing as a cash cow and have not backed their promises. Point is we didn't need to become bigger, we didn't need to press the button, there are clubs 'smaller' than us currently above us in the league.

I don't want to go over the same points over and over again, it has been done to death but again, today in the papers there is more questions about the leadership of this club. There seems very little to be happy about these days, and it has got worse over the last few years.

They are not owners with a club at its heart and don't ever believe it is, it has been a free stadium irrespective of being suitable for football and providing an enjoyable match day experience and the opportunity to rebrand a club to fit into a London corporate scene . If they truly love the club as much as they claim (crossed arms pics etc.) then they are truly incompetent owners and need to sell for the good of their club because they have done the exact opposite of people with the clubs interest at heart. If their actions have genuinely been for the good of the club then it shows they are out of their depth and do not have the right acumen to follow up such grand plans.

The stadium move could have launched us into a big club, they took the cheap option with self interest and that is why we will not progress under this group. They turned the screw with the owners of the stadium trying to get the best deal and yet that has left us with a party we cannot deal with, to the point where there are legal challenges, arguments about the colour of the surround around the pitch and cannot display a sign showing our triumphs!
Hammer.CA
Posts: 3177
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:37 pm
Has liked: 2888 likes
Total likes: 616 likes

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Hammer.CA »

Hammer.CA wrote:The owners will love this,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/articl ... ms-up.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The club have responded to yesterday's article. I'm not sure if they think the 3 pictures they've posted are supposed to impress and the comment that the owners have spent £10 million in the last 2 years but the pictures don't give that impression to me and I find this 'ensures we have some of the best facilities in the country' quote hard to believe.
By comparison, Leicester's planned new training facility is on a 150 acre site at a proposed cost of £80 million, still at least our ground is wonderful. :thdn:
User avatar
Condorhammer
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed May 24, 2017 9:42 am
Has liked: 1 like
Total likes: 1 like

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Post by Condorhammer »

I worked for the architects who designed Spurs, Brighton and Liverpool’s training grounds, and they are currently working on Leicesters. I was privileged (if that’s the correct term) to have a tour of the spuds facilities shortly before it opened 5/6 years ago, iirc. Believe me, it’s stunning. The whole ethos behind it being that it’s somewhere where you WANTED to spend the day training, and was intended to impress any potential new signing whether it be seasoned pro or promising youngster. If the shysters at our club truly believe that they’ve provided facilities suitable for a modern-day premier league club then it’s yet more proof (if it were needed) that they really are delusional and totally out of their depth. Splashing a coat of paint on the walls and providing more astroturf in the hallway? Yet more proof of their parsimony and total, absolute ineptitude.
C***s, all of them!
Last edited by Condorhammer on Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply