Gold and Sullivan ???

Does exactly what it says on the tin - the forum for football-related discussion.

Moderators: Rio, Gnome, chalks, -DL-, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Postby Faithless on Sat Apr 13, 2019 10:00 pm

hammer1975 wrote:Not sure if it’s an old interview

It's from todays after match show on BT Sport
User avatar
Posts: 1300
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 4:09 pm
Location: On a bubble approaching the sky.....Born 7 days too late...38 years n counting

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Postby aaronhammer on Sun May 12, 2019 8:35 am

This season there were 7 London based teams (including Watford if we use the inside M25 rule) in the Premier League.

It is possible depending on results today we will finish 6th of these with only Fulham below us, getting relegated.

All other 6 teams excluding us by the end of the season will have played in major cup final within Gold and Sullivan’s custodianship, with 4 involved this season.

Will they, or perhaps more importantly, can they, provide the manager with the required tools to bring us an opportunity of success - alongside continued Premier League football which appears to be their only requirement. Last summer was a good start towards that, but this summer is the real test. They failed with Bilic’s 2nd season which by all accounts became one of the key reasons we lost our world class player in Payet.

If the answer to the above is no, then they should relinquish their control and find owner’s that can.
User avatar
Posts: 9106
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 9:34 pm
Location: The Kitman

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Postby DasNutNock on Sun May 12, 2019 8:50 am

Why, it's almost as if they're putting their own interests before the fans'. Who'd have thought it, from someone as reputable as a pornographer?
User avatar
Posts: 12302
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 4:41 pm
Location: R Tape loading error, 0:1

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Postby hammer1975 on Sun May 12, 2019 1:09 pm

New annual rich list out today

Anyone subscribe to the Times to see if it says how much Dave’s shareholding is valued at (as a minimum indicator of what nonsensical price they’d actually consider selling us for)?
User avatar
Posts: 11033
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 10:16 pm

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Postby Romford_Iron on Sun May 12, 2019 2:00 pm

Puff Daddy wrote:since they became owners, they have witnessed the rise of several other clubs once considered inferior to West Ham United, overtake, surpass us and disappear into the distance under the control of overseas based ownership with staggering wealth, of which they will never have.

:lol: Who are these clubs?
User avatar
Posts: 1093
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:16 pm
Location: East Stand Upper

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Postby Puff Daddy on Thu May 16, 2019 7:36 pm

Romford_Iron wrote:
:lol: Who are these clubs?

:lol: Leicester for one, Wolves another and many others who outspend us, but anyhow, I have just spotted Gold's latest tweet, in which he brags about the sterling work currently being undertaken at the Chadwell Heath training ground. I wasn't aware any work was being carried out there, but hey ho according the him there is and he go's on to say how important it is to have a great training ground to further develop the youth programme as his son is there.
User avatar
Puff Daddy
Gone for a Burton
Posts: 23734
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:08 pm
Location: Westham Way

Re: Gold and Sullivan ???

Postby Hugh Jargon II on Thu May 16, 2019 7:59 pm

Gold is the master of misleading information. Not lies exactly. But regards the work at Chadwell Heath.

Theve painted the ceiling. Pardon?
User avatar
Hugh Jargon II
Posts: 3442
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 2:50 pm


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ageing hammer, Cuenca 'ammer, e17, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], HammerSaints, inter me nan, Loftyhammer, mrbluesky, Pocket Pardew, Prospero, Tenerife07, The Head of Brooking, thejackhammer, tommythehammer, vietnammer, worthinghammer and 138 guests


Fatal error: ./cache/ is NOT writable. in /web/sites/kumb/ on line 103