Fyodor wrote: The team eventually scoring does not mean Bilic did not lessen its chances of getting the win by subbing Chico off.
In other words, the team scored in spite of his absence, and not because of it.
Utter utter utter nonsense
Moderator: Gnome
Fyodor wrote: The team eventually scoring does not mean Bilic did not lessen its chances of getting the win by subbing Chico off.
In other words, the team scored in spite of his absence, and not because of it.
swansea hadn't conceded an away goal all season, getting a clean sheet at spurs last time of asking.Fyodor wrote:The team eventually scoring does not mean Bilic did not lessen its chances of getting the win by subbing Chico off.
In other words, the team scored in spite of his absence, and not because of it.
dear oh dearFyodor wrote:
The team eventually scoring does not mean Bilic did not lessen its chances of getting the win by subbing Chico off.
In other words, the team scored in spite of his absence, and not because of it.
Whilst I like the idea of what u say it seriously needs addressing that people take the times as a good paperScratchy wrote:Why is everyone so quick to believe a newspaper that makes the Sun look like the Times?
Man, you need to lie down.Fyodor wrote:
In other words, the team scored in spite of his absence, and not because of it.
Have to take into consideration the form of the opposition, we are talking about a team who held Spurs to 0-0 before us, and who have had a run of very very tight wins or losses before that.Colours never run wrote:Of course it's an assumption, it doesn't mean it wouldn't have been the case though. We can argue the toss either way, but my personal belief was we would have stood a better chance of winning much earlier than we did if it was to pan out that way. I was happy enough we eventually won by bringing Sakho and Masuaku on late, I just wish Bilic comes to the conclusion much sooner instead of making it harder work for himself which he's been guilty of in the past.
This.Colours never run wrote:Of course it's an assumption, it doesn't mean it wouldn't have been the case though. We can argue the toss either way, but my personal belief was we would have stood a better chance of winning much earlier than we did if it was to pan out that way. I was happy enough we eventually won by bringing Sakho and Masuaku on late, I just wish Bilic comes to the conclusion much sooner instead of making it harder work for himself which he's been guilty of in the past.
Turns to Stone wrote:The problem is not where Hernandez is playing, but the way we're playing. Many of you may have noticed, that not only is Hernandez being pulled out wide, but so too is Carroll. The only thing more ridiculous than Hernandez whipping a cross in, is Carroll.
Or you could argue that he is so keen to play and do well,he is hugely disappointed to be subbed.I am never to upset to see a player react like that.At least he gives a f***.the pink palermo wrote:Very disappointed to observe a player - probably our highest earning player in history - spitting the dummy when getting hauled off yesterday .
Totally disrespectful to his team mates, Managers and supporters .
This sort of thing is becoming very predictable now mate.the pink palermo wrote:Very disappointed to observe a player - probably our highest earning player in history - spitting the dummy when getting hauled off yesterday .
Totally disrespectful to his team mates, Managers and supporters .