Javier Hernandez Signs

A selection of the very best posts and/or most memorable threads on KUMB since the current Forum launched in 2002.

Moderator: Gnome

Post Reply
User avatar
Danny's Dyer Acting
Posts: 9041
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 1:37 pm
Has liked: 646 likes
Total likes: 1858 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by Danny's Dyer Acting »

[quote="Danny's Dyer Acting"]Check the heat maps. Even if Billic is trying to get them to stick rigidly to certain areas the information available proves they are not doing that.

Because people see what they want to see. There's a sizeable number who (not without reason) feel Billic isn't the man to take the club forwards and when they don't see Hernandez playing like Gary Lineker it's another stick to beat him with. In reality he's been asked to play a slightly different role to what would be ideal and has also been tasked with more responsibility defensively. Should he still be doing the exact same in 5/6 weeks (and results haven't continued to improve) questions should be asked but for now let's wait and see.
User avatar
warp
Posts: 14014
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:13 am
Location: I am everything about this site which is wrong... i don't give a toss about WHUFC.

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by warp »

Danny's Dyer Acting wrote:Should he still be doing the exact same in 5/6 weeks (and results haven't continued to improve) questions should be asked but for now let's wait and see.
no way carroll stays fit that long, so he'll be ok.

still, playing your best player out of position seems daft to me.
User avatar
derek zoolander
Posts: 7132
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:28 am
Location: King Wrong'un.......... B-)

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by derek zoolander »

Can we not just play with Hernandez & Carroll up front together?

Maybe go 3-5-2? :eh: put our two best players in the position they both want to be together? Bilic still gets to employ the 3 at the back as well.
User avatar
jastons
Posts: 12650
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 7:23 am
Location: Here
Has liked: 902 likes
Total likes: 859 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by jastons »

derek zoolander wrote:Can we not just play with Hernandez & Carroll up front together?

Maybe go 3-5-2? :eh: put our two best players in the position they both want to be together? Bilic still gets to employ the 3 at the back as well.
.

This. Absolutely this.

The biggest problem with playing Carroll up top on his own is that he gets isolated allowing opposition center backs to double up on him. Putting Hernandez next to him gives him a target for flick ons and more space to win them. Teams will leave at least three players back to mark Hernandez and Carroll.
User avatar
Ozza
Posts: 28289
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:41 pm
Location: Here, there, every f****** where
Has liked: 943 likes
Total likes: 2392 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by Ozza »

derek zoolander wrote:Can we not just play with Hernandez & Carroll up front together?

Maybe go 3-5-2? :eh: put our two best players in the position they both want to be together? Bilic still gets to employ the 3 at the back as well.
The problem is with two wing backs you are then left trying to accommodate 3 out of Iron Mike, Obiang, Chiekh, Ayew, Marko, Noble, Lanzini etc

Hernandez would also need to play really as a 10 (sort of what he's doing at the moment in my mind anyway),

the other thing that happens is you lose the press on their full backs (if they are at a 4 at the back), which isn't good
Hammers1993
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 12:18 pm
Location: Essex
Has liked: 1 like
Contact:

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by Hammers1993 »

Posted this on another thread but seeing as the post was actually about Chicharito and the formation to suit us thought I'd get it in here:

Unfortunately with the players we have available to us it makes things difficult getting them all in the team:

- Antonio (arguably our best attacking player at times, just behind Lanzini)
(Antonio has to play RW/RM as he is wasted at RB/RWB being one of our best attacking players and poor defensively, as has already been proven).

- Lanzini (who's best role is behind the striker(s).

- Arnautovic (our record signing)

- Chicharito (need's a 2nd striker to play alongside)

The only formation that would accomodate these players is this:

--------------------Hart----------------------------
--Zabaleta--Reid--Ogbonna--Masuaku---
-------------------Obiang--------------------------
--Antonio-------Lanzini----------Arnautovic--
--------------Sakho--Chicharito----------------

Man City played that formation at the weekend. (yes we are not Man City, but with the players we have it's the only way it accomdates them to their best roles.

Carroll would be an impact sub around 60 mins for me as him playing just changes the whole gameplan in a way that majority of us do not see as an enjoyable football style (no issue with us playing it if and when needed, but not from the off every game), however him coming on as an impact sub would be extremely useful.

That gives you variation of Lanzini dropping next to Obiang, not ideal but the only way the players listed get in the team to utilize their best capabilities/roles.
User avatar
warp
Posts: 14014
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 11:13 am
Location: I am everything about this site which is wrong... i don't give a toss about WHUFC.

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by warp »

^ we ship enough goals with a back 7, wouldn't reduce it to a back 5!
User avatar
Patito
Posts: 10112
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:51 pm
Location: Irons

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by Patito »

Hernandez is perfectly capable of playing as a lone striker, he has done it plenty of times. I don't understand why anyone under 6 foot is immediately deemed incapable of playing as a lone striker.
User avatar
fjthegrey
Posts: 23050
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Ayakin
Has liked: 14 likes
Total likes: 1168 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by fjthegrey »

warp wrote:^ we ship enough goals with a back 7, wouldn't reduce it to a back 5!
Yes. It's a terrible lineup.

It'd only be acceptable to have that on the pitch if you were desperately chasing a deficit fairly late in the game.
User avatar
spod
Posts: 1588
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 11:28 am
Location: London
Has liked: 318 likes
Total likes: 287 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by spod »

I'm really confused about Hernandez coming on as a sub last night and against Cheltenham.
Must be a contractual thing, surely.
User avatar
Hammer1972
Posts: 5752
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 8:18 am
Has liked: 56 likes
Total likes: 209 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by Hammer1972 »

spod wrote:I'm really confused about Hernandez coming on as a sub last night and against Cheltenham.
Must be a contractual thing, surely.
Yes, he is contracted to play football for West Ham United, hence we can play him in matches.
User avatar
MB
Cricket's Darren Anderton
Posts: 25274
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:13 pm
Has liked: 5678 likes
Total likes: 3096 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by MB »

Patito wrote:Hernandez is perfectly capable of playing as a lone striker, he has done it plenty of times. I don't understand why anyone under 6 foot is immediately deemed incapable of playing as a lone striker.
Capable yes. Capable with our current midfield options no. Carroll is basically the number 10 at the moment. Once Lanzini is back then Hernandez is better placed to lead the line but he'll need Lanzini and probably Arnie on the pitch or he'll barely see the ball.
User avatar
MK Hammer 3
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:53 pm
Location: Bournemouth
Contact:

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by MK Hammer 3 »

[quote="Hammers1993"]...
The only formation that would accomodate these players is this:

--------------------Hart----------------------------
--Zabaleta--Reid--Ogbonna--Masuaku---
-------------------Obiang--------------------------
--Antonio-------Lanzini----------Arnautovic--
--------------Sakho--Chicharito----------------

...
replace Ogbonna with Rice at the back and we've cracked it.
User avatar
Westbourne Bill
Posts: 7483
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:49 pm
Location: W Sussex
Has liked: 130 likes
Total likes: 333 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by Westbourne Bill »

So I'm guessing if we had signed Giroud when we were interested in him, he would be playing on the wing instead of Hernandez. Bizarre.
User avatar
bitter-iron-ny
Posts: 7272
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 6:17 am
Location: NYC
Has liked: 206 likes
Total likes: 233 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by bitter-iron-ny »

Somewhat off-topic but something clearly on the player's mind, Chicharito along with Layun have undertaken a relief fund for victims of the Mexico City earthquake.

https://www.si.com/soccer/2017/09/20/mi ... ns-victims
User avatar
Hockley Hammer
Posts: 3814
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:54 pm
Location: Keeping calm and carrying on.
Has liked: 1 like
Total likes: 30 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by Hockley Hammer »

I was at Arsenal last night and they lined up with the big man in the middle (Giroud) and Sanchez on the left and Walcott on the right.

It was interesting watching them play. They got the ball to Sanchez at every opportunity or he went looking for the ball. He went outside very few times, cut in or went across the pitch, often played it into Giroud and ran off him for the return. He did very little defensively.

I can't see why it it a problem if Hernandez has to play there at times If we get the ball to him quickly he will have space to run into with the ball, as he is a forward he will know the positions to take up in the box.

We seem to have been moaning for years about players being played out of position on the left. Ironically I thought Snodgrass would finally put that right and that turned out poorly, in my opinion we played him on the wrong side too often..

I cant see why sometimes we can't get a smaller forward to play on the left and do a job and then on other times play him through the middle playing off somebody.

Lanzini seems comfortable doing it but you want your most creative player central most of the time.
User avatar
SRXT
Posts: 872
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 7:12 am
Location: New Zealand
Has liked: 54 likes
Total likes: 10 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by SRXT »

Why can't he just play arguably one of our best players, track record wise and whatever else, in his best position, something West Ham has been crying out for for years, a decent striker! Headbanger If you want a big lad in a front three, why not use Arno?
User avatar
westham,eggyandchips
Posts: 25277
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: On the tour bus
Has liked: 2019 likes
Total likes: 1494 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by westham,eggyandchips »

The fact Bilic has had to speak to him about the situation tells me there is unrest already from our star striker. I don't blame him either. Slav needs to get this right, and quickly.
User avatar
thejackhammer
Posts: 9189
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 11:49 pm
Total likes: 2 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by thejackhammer »

westham,eggyandchips wrote:The fact Bilic has had to speak to him about the situation tells me there is unrest already from our star striker. I don't blame him either. Slav needs to get this right, and quickly.
Or, Bilic, who many players have spoken of, having excellent man management skills, pre emptively spoke to him, to ensure he knows this is a temperary measure until the return of Lanzini.
User avatar
westham,eggyandchips
Posts: 25277
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:06 pm
Location: On the tour bus
Has liked: 2019 likes
Total likes: 1494 likes

Re: Javier Hernandez Signs

Post by westham,eggyandchips »

thejackhammer wrote:
Or, Bilic, who many players have spoken of, having excellent man management skills, pre emptively spoke to him, to ensure he knows this is a temperary measure until the return of Lanzini.
I hope its that straightforward.
Post Reply