#59 Sweden 0-2 England - Quarter Finals

All discussion relating to international tournaments including qualifying groups/matches. Since 2006.

Moderators: Gnome, last.caress, Wilko1304, Rio, bristolhammerfc, the pink palermo, chalks

Post Reply
User avatar
S-H
Posts: 49130
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:05 am
Location: Kumb Inn
Has liked: 5738 likes
Total likes: 9653 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by S-H »

Voronin wrote:Going to be very interesting. Sweden have been incredible with at very weak side on paper. It’s going to be tight, and definately not a stroll for England. The English arrogance never denies itself.....
So predicting or wanting our national team to win, is arrogance?

No one seriously thinks it'll be a stroll, we are English, we are pessimists, but so what if they did, its harmless optimism, not arrogance.

:?
fmgod
Posts: 19333
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:54 pm
Has liked: 50 likes
Total likes: 134 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by fmgod »

Sterling needs to be dropped and if Ali plays he needs to be basically upfront for when Kane drops deep, he was sort of out on the left yesterday most of the time that didn't suit him.

Got to get tight on Forsberg, boy is a player, like a Kevin De Bruyne light,
User avatar
Patito
Posts: 10112
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:51 pm
Location: Irons

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Patito »

Their back 4 absolutely love defending you can tell watching them. It will be very difficult to break them down, could be 0-0 after 120 mins then penalties as their strikers are pretty average. Can't see us getting much change out of them at set pieces either they are a big side and strong in the air.
User avatar
e17
Posts: 17984
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Deep deep down
Has liked: 284 likes
Total likes: 956 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by e17 »

fmgod wrote:Sterling needs to be dropped and if Ali plays he needs to be basically upfront for when Kane drops deep, he was sort of out on the left yesterday most of the time that didn't suit him.

Got to get tight on Forsberg, boy is a player, like a Kevin De Bruyne light,
I was just about to say I’d drop Ali, not Sterling.

Aside from his confidence issue with scoring, I actually thought Sterling was one of the more lively options yesterday. We operate far better when he’s in there, as he consistently drags players with him when he’s on the pitch.

Ali on the other hand simply does not look fit.
fmgod
Posts: 19333
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:54 pm
Has liked: 50 likes
Total likes: 134 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by fmgod »

e17 wrote: I was just about to say I’d drop Ali, not Sterling.

Aside from his confidence issue with scoring, I actually thought Sterling was one of the more lively options yesterday. We operate far better when he’s in there, as he consistently drags players with him when he’s on the pitch.

Ali on the other hand simply does not look fit.
It's a hard one as Ali on the left wing is a complete waste/doesn't work but Ali infront of/in behind /Kane is where he plays week in week out

Sterling is always "lively", it's just what he actually does.

As I said last night it's just gutting we don't have one upper level midfielder like a James, Modric, even an Isco etc who has that knack of playing vital passes or scoring long balls.
User avatar
S-H
Posts: 49130
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:05 am
Location: Kumb Inn
Has liked: 5738 likes
Total likes: 9653 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by S-H »

e17 wrote: I was just about to say I’d drop Ali, not Sterling.

Aside from his confidence issue with scoring, I actually thought Sterling was one of the more lively options yesterday. We operate far better when he’s in there, as he consistently drags players with him when he’s on the pitch.

Ali on the other hand simply does not look fit.
Completely agree.
User avatar
Puff Daddy
Gone for a Burton
Posts: 42418
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Westham Way
Has liked: 255 likes
Total likes: 1158 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Puff Daddy »

They pose no attacking threat and they know that. So, they will pack the and defence and midfield by putting 10 men behind the ball and rely on a set piece of their own
fmgod
Posts: 19333
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:54 pm
Has liked: 50 likes
Total likes: 134 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by fmgod »

Puff Daddy wrote:They pose no attacking threat and they know that. So, they will pack the and defence and midfield by putting 10 men behind the ball and rely on a set piece of their own
A little bit harsh on them? I haven't watched all their matches but scored against Germany, stuck 3 past Mexico and one past Switzerland last night
User avatar
Voronin
Posts: 1910
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Göteborg, Sweden

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Voronin »

somerset-hammer wrote:
So predicting or wanting our national team to win, is arrogance?

No one seriously thinks it'll be a stroll, we are English, we are pessimists, but so what if they did, its harmless optimism, not arrogance.

:?
I’ve seen loads of people saying you will breeze past us. We’ve eliminated Holland, Italy and Germany so far. And beaten France, no team has had an easy game against us, and you surely won’t. Of course you are favourites to win on saturday, but you’ll need to perform a lot better to back upp all this ”it’s coming home” business.
Anyway, really looking forward to saturday, and I’m 100% certain that the Swedes will make me proud, regardless of result.
bobcar
Posts: 2800
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:00 pm

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by bobcar »

Voronin wrote:Going to be very interesting. Sweden have been incredible with at very weak side on paper. It’s going to be tight, and definately not a stroll for England. The English arrogance never denies itself.....
I have to say I really haven't seen any signs of "English arrogance". There was some OTT optimism in the non sporting media after the victory over Panama but most people recognised that match for what it was.

The way the penalty shoot out victory was celebrated was certainly not arrogance, arrogance would have been expecting to go through and underestimating the opposition.
nickkarkie
Posts: 6946
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:41 pm
Has liked: 65 likes
Total likes: 159 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by nickkarkie »

Sterling's technique is shocking, it just negates all the pace he has and good runs he makes, surely he works on kicking the ball with his left foot and his touch. Alli just doesn't perform for England no matter where he has been played, even behind Kane, hard to figure out why, yesterday as FM says he was more inside left but still he is not getting involved enough.
User avatar
S-H
Posts: 49130
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:05 am
Location: Kumb Inn
Has liked: 5738 likes
Total likes: 9653 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by S-H »

Voronin wrote:
I’ve seen loads of people saying you will breeze past us. We’ve eliminated Holland, Italy and Germany so far. And beaten France, no team has had an easy game against us, and you surely won’t. Of course you are favourites to win on saturday, but you’ll need to perform a lot better to back upp all this ”it’s coming home” business.
Anyway, really looking forward to saturday, and I’m 100% certain that the Swedes will make me proud, regardless of result.
f*** it.

I hope we smash you to pieces.

It's coming home, etc.

Vindaloo!!


:scarfer:
User avatar
swash
Posts: 3676
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 10:30 pm
Location: Not enough middle fingers
Has liked: 140 likes
Total likes: 196 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by swash »

Don't think Alli has been fit since the start of the tournament, Southgate is not usually afraid of making the big decisions, but for me he's got to leave Alli out of this one.

Sterling drives us all mad, but you can't blame Southgate for having his head turned by his record at City this season, added to which Rashford always seems more effective coming off the bench than as a starter.

So I would bring in Loftus-Cheek for Alli and keep the rest of the team the same.
User avatar
Kludgehammer
Posts: 9558
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 12:33 pm
Has liked: 180 likes
Total likes: 203 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Kludgehammer »

The big problem with Sterling, IMHO, is that he's been pretty good/great in an absolutely dominant side in the league, but looks really average in an average side in Internationals.

Against which, I thought he actually had some moments yesterday - drives me mad the number of times he loses the ball, usually by trying to dribble the ball through someone's leg* and then collapsing to the floor (aka "doing a Wilshire"), but he did move their defence around a bit with his pace.

Alli on the other hand, was a passenger.

I'd drop Alli and probably Stirling for the Swedes - RLC for Alli (assuming he's fit), and I might have a punt on Welbeck up front with Kane. Yes, Welbeck. I know he's been cack in the league for the last couple of years, but Rashford and Vardy had a chance with the B team against Belgium and did absolutely nothing (albeit without brilliant service), while Welbeck has history of being far better for England than his club form, which is pretty unique among England players. He also has a knack for getting in behind the defence and causing chances, which we've got no-one doing at the moment. Also, he's the last person the Swedes will be expecting, so they'll be unprepared for him :)
User avatar
Harry Hound
Posts: 4020
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:25 pm
Location: "If you don't know the game, then you're still part of it"
Has liked: 67 likes
Total likes: 10 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Harry Hound »

nickkarkie wrote:Sterling's technique is shocking, it just negates all the pace he has and good runs he makes, surely he works on kicking the ball with his left foot and his touch. Alli just doesn't perform for England no matter where he has been played, even behind Kane, hard to figure out why, yesterday as FM says he was more inside left but still he is not getting involved enough.
I agree with this absolutely, Sterling produces very limited results and it's the end product "goals" that's important as a forward and he just doesn't score or assist enough, he also appears to be very lightweight. Lingard is far less technical but produces more and is hard-working and tenacious. Loftus-Cheek should start before either Sterling or Ali as should Welbeck.
User avatar
Harry Hound
Posts: 4020
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:25 pm
Location: "If you don't know the game, then you're still part of it"
Has liked: 67 likes
Total likes: 10 likes

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Harry Hound »

Kludgehammer wrote: I might have a punt on Welbeck up front with Kane. Yes, Welbeck. I know he's been cack in the league for the last couple of years, but Rashford and Vardy had a chance with the B team against Belgium and did absolutely nothing (albeit without brilliant service), while Welbeck has history of being far better for England than his club form, which is pretty unique among England players. He also has a knack for getting in behind the defence and causing chances, which we've got no-one doing at the moment. Also, he's the last person the Swedes will be expecting, so they'll be unprepared for him :)
:thup: Couldn't agree more
User avatar
DasNutNock
Posts: 12302
Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 4:41 pm
Location: R Tape loading error, 0:1

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by DasNutNock »

Voronin wrote:Going to be very interesting. Sweden have been incredible with at very weak side on paper. It’s going to be tight, and definately not a stroll for England. The English arrogance never denies itself.....
I need to correct you here - what you are talking about is not arrogance, but "perceived arrogance", and that is a reflects poorly on you, not "the English".
User avatar
Patito
Posts: 10112
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:51 pm
Location: Irons

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Patito »

Voronin wrote:
I’ve seen loads of people saying you will breeze past us. We’ve eliminated Holland, Italy and Germany so far. And beaten France, no team has had an easy game against us, and you surely won’t. Of course you are favourites to win on saturday, but you’ll need to perform a lot better to back upp all this ”it’s coming home” business.
Anyway, really looking forward to saturday, and I’m 100% certain that the Swedes will make me proud, regardless of result.

That's strange because I haven't seen a single person saying it's going to be easy etc. Are you still based in Goteborg, Voronin?
User avatar
Voronin
Posts: 1910
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:41 pm
Location: Göteborg, Sweden

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by Voronin »

Patito wrote:
That's strange because I haven't seen a single person saying it's going to be easy etc. Are you still based in Goteborg, Voronin?
I am mate. Tbf it’s mostly on twitter etc. but a few posts in this very thread suggested the same. And all this ”let’s lose to Belgium to get to the final easier” sounded quite arrogant to the rest of the world. Fwiw I like the new attitude among the young english players, they are much more fearless, and joyful to watch. Just not good enough to win.

Really looking forward to saturday! :thup:
bobcar
Posts: 2800
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 2:00 pm

Re: Quarter Finals - Sweden v England~ Match thread

Post by bobcar »

Voronin wrote: I am mate. Tbf it’s mostly on twitter etc. but a few posts in this very thread suggested the same. And all this ”let’s lose to Belgium to get to the final easier” sounded quite arrogant to the rest of the world.
That's not arrogance it's realism. Surely Swedes think that England then Croatia/Russia is easier than Brazil then France? That's not arrogance either.

Easier doesn't mean easy, easier can still be difficult.
Post Reply