I've not said the migration process doesn't have flaws; in fact the opposite I think the way they have done it is pretty **** on long renewing season ticket holders, it's wrong they did it on band only and not length of service and when I went for my appointment I was very disappointed with the options I was offered in my band, they were not comparable at all.wizzo_66 wrote:
To be fair mate, you've more of an agenda with your 'I'm all right, Jack' attitude towards fellow supporters that are pointing out valid flaws in the process.
I agree with you that transport links are excellent...but we can disagree with some clear evidence rather than all this agenda, desperation etc comments.
I'm yet to see anyone politely respond with any evidence to the issues around migration which show the whole process to be flawed for our most loyal of supporters.
So have been very critical of the part of the move.
I don't really have too much of a view on transport links either, I think the food and drink currently available is awful so imagine a wider a better quality option will be available at the OS.
My only real gripe is on the subject of views and it's been consistent since the start and nothing to do with the tickets I've ended up getting.
I went to a pre-Olympic event in the stadium, went to the back of the East upper to see what that was like and have based all my opinions of the views from having been there early on.
So can't help feel strongly when I hear people that haven't been say the views won't be good enough or if someone that doesn't have an eyesight problem say they can't see the action as I know this not to be fair.
I also feel that we need to understand that a much bigger stadium will be different to the ground we are leaving behind; some things I'm sure will be missed and some things better but it will never be "the same"
On the whole it has been very encouraging reading all the positive reviews over the last two nights and I apologise for getting wound up by the minority negative posts