West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
Moderator: Gnome
- wayneo1974
- Posts: 3092
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:12 pm
- Location: The swingers club
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
Terry Brown?MrBen wrote:I wonder who got £450k in compo for loss of office - Eggy?
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
wayneo1974 wrote:next year we will be awash with cash. wont we? :lol:
If West Ham are still owned by the current bunch and we sign Jimenez that will probably be all our tranfer budget gone, so we will have still sell before we buy anyone else. :cry:
- party iron
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:56 am
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
Thanks mr ben.
So are the accounts showing the £37m loss including the pay out (£21m) to sheff u ? If so why are they showing the full amount and not just what was payable that year ?
So are the accounts showing the £37m loss including the pay out (£21m) to sheff u ? If so why are they showing the full amount and not just what was payable that year ?
- smuts
- Posts: 33747
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:28 am
- Location: East, East, East London
- Has liked: 1498 likes
- Total likes: 1440 likes
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
£24 million to McC*nt.
How did we manage to f*ck that one up so bad?
I suppose that we have to be grateful that BG didn't buy himself a super yacht and then pass those loans onto us as well.... :shock:
How did we manage to f*ck that one up so bad?
I suppose that we have to be grateful that BG didn't buy himself a super yacht and then pass those loans onto us as well.... :shock:
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
ahem, "Accounts" that should give one a huge clue as to the interest value of said content reallyGeorgee Paris wrote:Is this what you might call a damp squid?
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
Party Iron wrote
Because the accounts are prepared on an accruals basis (recognising income as it is earned and expenditure as it is incurred) and not on a cash basis.So are the accounts showing the £37m loss including the pay out (£21m) to Sh*ff u ? If so why are they showing the full amount and not just what was payable that year ?
- York Ham(mer)
- Posts: 9644
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 6:15 am
- Location: In exile up north
- Has liked: 111 likes
- Total likes: 149 likes
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
Party Iron wrote:So are the accounts showing the £37m loss including the pay out (£21m) to Sh*ff u ? If so why are they showing the full amount and not just what was payable that year ?
Is the right answer.johnu175 wrote:Because the accounts are prepared on an accruals basis (recognising income as it is earned and expenditure as it is incurred) and not on a cash basis.
- party iron
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:56 am
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
So these accounts should be the lowest point, as it was from that point on the selling and cut backs where being made.
- carnage
- Posts: 22524
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 2:22 pm
- Location: KFC
- Has liked: 84 likes
- Total likes: 707 likes
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
Indeed Party. Duxbury told us the accounts were a disaster. He didn't lie there for sure.
He also said things were a lot better now and we would have money to spend next summer.
He also said things were a lot better now and we would have money to spend next summer.
- party iron
- Posts: 2537
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:56 am
Re: West Ham accounts reveal loss of £37m
So the panic is over now. Unless we get relegated this yearcarnage wrote:Indeed Party. Duxbury told us the accounts were a disaster. He didn't lie there for sure.
He also said things were a lot better now and we would have money to spend next summer.