WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

All you need to know about West Ham United FC's potential move to Stratford.

Moderators: Lost Hammer, bonehead, chalks, goes2eleven, Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus, bristolhammerfc, Wheels, sicknote, Romford, Rio, Gnome, Northern Paulo

Re: WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

Postby Hammer110 on Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:26 pm

brownout wrote:Brady is trying to claim that a straw poll, conducted at the end of their presentation which included some mock up photos but no firm plans, showed 100% support. But some obstained. Now she says no one voted against - but there was no show of hands against.This manipulation is a joke.
Albie Beck wrote:Obviously I'm not familiar with the structure of the SAB meeting, but did no-one have an opportunity to ask for a show of hands against? Clearly for those who didn't put their hands up in agreement there must have been a natural desire to have their feelings noted?

Normally when taking vote on a show of hands on an informal basis if there is an obvious majority on the first show, then it's usual not to take it any further shows. Normally this would be described simply as a majority or sometime a small/large majority, for the club to describe it any other way is wrong. In fact it is really stupid of the club to say no one voted against, as it is just not believable that given the opportunity no one would have voted against.
User avatar
Hammer110
 
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 11:56 pm
Location: Looking forward to the new season, new league, new challenges, bring it on. 父 父

Re: WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

Postby mywhufc on Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:00 pm

Albie Beck wrote:Obviously I'm not familiar with the structure of the SAB meeting, but did no-one have an opportunity to ask for a show of hands against? Clearly for those who didn't put their hands up in agreement there must have been a natural desire to have their feelings noted?
Hammer110 wrote:Normally when taking vote on a show of hands on an informal basis if there is an obvious majority on the first show, then it's usual not to take it any further shows. Normally this would be described simply as a majority or sometime a small/large majority, for the club to describe it any other way is wrong. In fact it is really stupid of the club to say no one voted against, as it is just not believable that given the opportunity no one would have voted against.

At the time it seemed a straight forward show of hands, many did some didnt?
User avatar
mywhufc
 
Posts: 2091
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 8:25 pm

Re: WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

Postby Up the Junction on Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:11 am

brownout wrote:Tara Warren from the club attended WHU'S VIEW's meeting last night and said that Brady was misquoted in these articles.

She said that Brady didn't say there was 100% support from the SAB, implying that journalist(s) made up that figure. She said that Brady said somethng on the lines of that she knows fans are against the move and understands why.

It's dead easy to resolve. Jacquelin Magnay - the story's author - can be contacted via Twitter:

https://twitter.com/#!/jacquelinmagnay
User avatar
Up the Junction
Thinks he owns the place
 
Posts: 36781
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 1:03 am

Re: WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

Postby Hampshire Hammer on Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:20 pm

Whilst people are pressing Brady for a clarification/correction can I just ask; wasn't the question along the lines of "if the Olympic Stadium was made suitable for use as a football stadium would you support it?" or have I mis-remembered? I only ask because that is also a suspicious question, as it will mean different things to different people and will sway some people towards yes based on their view of what those changes would be.
User avatar
Hampshire Hammer
 
Posts: 4366
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:18 pm
Location: Somewhere south of sanity

Re: WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

Postby brownout on Sat Apr 14, 2012 9:24 am

Brady said in her Sun column today:

THURSDAY

A WEST HAM fans group would like a poll on whether the club should move to the Olympic Stadium. Let me assure them there is no chance of a move there without wide consultation with all supporters.

Before we can do so, though, we have to wait until May 21 when legal restrictions are lifted and then we can explain in fullest detail what a transfer in 2014 would mean to fans and the club. The owners will not sanction a move unless they are satisfied in every respect it is a world-class football stadium.

So Wednesday the club tell the BBC they will hold a poll - now it's 'wide consultation'.
The club have made so many conflicting statements as to whther they will hold a poll - can we trust them?
User avatar
brownout
 
Posts: 5675
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 9:26 pm

Re: WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

Postby paulhs1 on Sat Apr 14, 2012 11:16 am

Brady will say and do anything to get her way! Really, the fans are an insignificance when compared to her own selfish ambitions. This includes some people within the SAB, who shes using as her foot soldiers !
User avatar
paulhs1
 
Posts: 1384
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 3:32 pm
Location: Just north of the Thames

Re: WHU Supporters 100% behind the OS move- Brady

Postby Hammer Smith on Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:09 am

Amazing the change of tune from Brady as soon as the BBC start asking questions. Its like 'Watchdog' (no pun intended) where unscrupulous businessmen turn into Mr Nice Guy as soon as their grubby little plans are exposed.
User avatar
Hammer Smith
 
Posts: 2898
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 7:43 pm
Location: In the shadows

Previous

Return to The Olympic Stadium

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests