Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Anything goes in The Snug, the GD's rebellious little brother. An off-topic den of iniquity for non-football/news related musings.

Moderators: Lost Hammer, bonehead, chalks, goes2eleven, Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus, bristolhammerfc, Wheels, sicknote, Romford, Rio, Gnome, Northern Paulo

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Cuenca 'ammer on Thu May 17, 2012 10:58 pm

He's no Steve Irwin (but he made it look so easy).....................................................


:lol:

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/video?id=8665223
User avatar
Cuenca 'ammer
ex 'ouston 'ammer
 
Posts: 22992
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Czech Hammer on Tue May 29, 2012 10:11 pm

Some football related questions:

1) Why did the governing body decide to bring in the play off system?

2) In the 80's for a few seasons, bottom of division played top of division below. Why was this scrapped? Much more interesting...

3) What happened before the sendings off were allowed?

4) What was the point of the Premier League coming about? It was not a new division, just replced the old division 1? Surely it would have made more sense in the Premier league being the top new division, and having 4 divisions below that, just bringing in more non league to make up the rest of div 4?

5) Where is Nigel Quashie?
User avatar
Czech Hammer
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:49 pm
Location: Prague / London

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Bend it like Repka on Tue May 29, 2012 10:41 pm

I took a load of garden waste to the dump at the weekend. Some of the ants from the garden came along for the ride in the bags.

So what happens to those ants removed from their colony? Do they

1) Die a lonely death as they depend on their own colony
2) Find a new colony and exist there
3) Live a normal lifespan alone
User avatar
Bend it like Repka
 
Posts: 5648
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: In a synth band checking there are no guitars

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Hammers Dad on Tue May 29, 2012 10:53 pm

Czech Hammer wrote:Some football related questions:

1) Why did the governing body decide to bring in the play off system? Money

2) In the 80's for a few seasons, bottom of division played top of division below. Why was this scrapped? Much more interesting...Money

3) What happened before the sendings off were allowed? Stiff tellings off with no bubble bath after the game

4) What was the point of the Premier League coming about? It was not a new division, just replced the old division 1? Surely it would have made more sense in the Premier league being the top new division, and having 4 divisions below that, just bringing in more non league to make up the rest of div 4? Money

5) Where is Nigel Quashie? Looking for bubble bath and money


They still had sendings off etc before the cards, just nothing was shown.
User avatar
Hammers Dad
 
Posts: 4025
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:37 pm
Location: Awaiting my P45

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby James P on Wed May 30, 2012 11:03 am

Can someone please briefly explain the intricacies of oval track racing like Nascar. I'm sure for quarter of a million people to turn up and watch there must be more to it than driving around in a circle for 200 laps but I'm damned if I can spot it.
User avatar
James P
 
Posts: 9643
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Romford

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby sendô on Wed May 30, 2012 11:21 am

James P wrote:Can someone please briefly explain the intricacies of oval track racing like Nascar. I'm sure for quarter of a million people to turn up and watch there must be more to it than driving around in a circle for 200 laps but I'm damned if I can spot it.

I'd imagine like most endurance races it's the sheer concentration of having to go around the same two slow left hand bends 200 times without falling asleep due to sheer boredom.

I wonder if they drug test people for red bull and strong black coffee just to keep it interesting?
User avatar
sendô
 
Posts: 14874
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: in the pessimistically optimistic camp.

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Irish Iron on Wed May 30, 2012 4:45 pm

James P wrote:Can someone please briefly explain the intricacies of oval track racing like Nascar. I'm sure for quarter of a million people to turn up and watch there must be more to it than driving around in a circle for 200 laps but I'm damned if I can spot it.


Crashes. Lots and lots of crashes.
User avatar
Irish Iron
 
Posts: 3938
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:50 pm

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Cuenca 'ammer on Wed May 30, 2012 7:46 pm

Count 3 turn left count 1 turn left count 3 turn left count 1 turn left.

That's how intricate it gets.
User avatar
Cuenca 'ammer
ex 'ouston 'ammer
 
Posts: 22992
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 5:19 pm
Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Philosophical Dan on Wed May 30, 2012 9:06 pm

Can anyone explain Gauss's theorem to me? I never got my head around it whilst reading Electronics at university, and have still yet to get to grips with even the most basic concepts. Tried reading a few things off the interweb, but am still none the wiser.

NOTE: My failure to understand Gauss's theorem does not make me an "Idiot" :)
User avatar
Philosophical Dan
KUMB's campest cyclist
 
Posts: 23172
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 4:40 pm
Location: 10 PRINT "Philosophical Dan is Skill! "; 20 GOTO 10

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby sendô on Wed May 30, 2012 9:30 pm

"The electric flux through any closed surface is proportional to the enclosed electric charge."

My technical electrical detailed knowledge such as the above isn't as it could be, but I understand it to be that the magnetic field around a conductor will increase or decrease in proportion to the electrical charge in a closed surface.

Not really a law I've ever had to use if I'm honest.
User avatar
sendô
 
Posts: 14874
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: in the pessimistically optimistic camp.

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Philosophical Dan on Wed May 30, 2012 9:40 pm

sendô wrote:"The electric flux through any closed surface is proportional to the enclosed electric charge."

My technical electrical detailed knowledge such as the above isn't as it could be, but I understand it to be that the magnetic field around a conductor will increase or decrease in proportion to the electrical charge in a closed surface.

Not really a law I've ever had to use if I'm honest.


So... the amount of flux lines bisecting a closed surface increases as the contained charge increases & decreases as the contained charge decreases? Is that right? ****ing hell, is it as simple as that?
User avatar
Philosophical Dan
KUMB's campest cyclist
 
Posts: 23172
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 4:40 pm
Location: 10 PRINT "Philosophical Dan is Skill! "; 20 GOTO 10

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby orbital on Thu May 31, 2012 9:30 am

How do condensing combi boilers work, how can it be possible to turn cold water into hot instantly?
orbital
 
Posts: 860
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:39 pm
Location: M25 J17

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby sendô on Thu May 31, 2012 9:38 am

Philosophical Dan wrote:So... the amount of flux lines bisecting a closed surface increases as the contained charge increases & decreases as the contained charge decreases? Is that right? ****ing hell, is it as simple as that?

That's how I understand it. Maybe there's more to it that I'm not seeing, but in my experience most laws of physics are actually quite simple once you get your head around them or what they're trying to state. Dunno, perhaps I've over simplified it but that's the way it seems.
User avatar
sendô
 
Posts: 14874
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: in the pessimistically optimistic camp.

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby shammy on Thu May 31, 2012 9:45 am

As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?
User avatar
shammy
 
Posts: 4400
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 10:21 am
Location: The Hamlets of the Tower

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Burningaham on Thu May 31, 2012 10:32 am

shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?


it might be cold by now
User avatar
Burningaham
 
Posts: 1561
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: watchin you, watchin us, watchin them.

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Czech Hammer on Thu May 31, 2012 11:17 am

shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?




aaaaaaaaaaaaand I am going to puzzling over that all day.
User avatar
Czech Hammer
 
Posts: 1556
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:49 pm
Location: Prague / London

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby BJA1990 on Thu May 31, 2012 11:59 am

shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?


There'd be bacteria on the sandwich though. Whether it'd survive and be able to reproduce is another matter entirely.
User avatar
BJA1990
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:57 pm
Location: East Stand Upper.

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby White Goodman on Thu May 31, 2012 12:05 pm

BJA1990 wrote:
There'd be bacteria on the sandwich though. Whether it'd survive and be able to reproduce is another matter entirely.


I'm no expert but surely bacteria need oxygen to survive.
User avatar
White Goodman
 
Posts: 10645
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:50 pm
Location: Not saving anything for the swim back

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Tsinclair on Thu May 31, 2012 1:11 pm

Why are there limits to FREEDOM of speech?
User avatar
Tsinclair
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:24 pm
Location: Chadwell Heath

Re: Idiot Amnesty Pt.II

Postby Hammers Dad on Thu May 31, 2012 2:23 pm

shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?


It would seem that bacteria may be able to survive:

Bacteria taken from cliffs at Beer on the South Coast have shown themselves to be hardy space travellers.

The bugs were put on the exterior of the space station to see how they would cope in the hostile conditions that exist above the Earth's atmosphere.

And when scientists inspected the microbes a year and a half later, they found many were still alive.

These survivors are now thriving in a laboratory at the Open University (OU) in Milton Keynes.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11039206
User avatar
Hammers Dad
 
Posts: 4025
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:37 pm
Location: Awaiting my P45

PreviousNext

Return to The Snug

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: EastLondonHammer, Google Adsense [Bot], maltab and 10 guests