Anything goes in The Snug, the GD's rebellious little brother. An off-topic den of iniquity for non-football/news related musings.
Moderators: Lost Hammer, bonehead, chalks, goes2eleven, Alf Garnett's (Ex) Missus, bristolhammerfc, Wheels, sicknote, Romford, Rio, Gnome, Northern Paulo
by Czech Hammer on Tue May 29, 2012 10:11 pm
Some football related questions:
1) Why did the governing body decide to bring in the play off system?
2) In the 80's for a few seasons, bottom of division played top of division below. Why was this scrapped? Much more interesting...
3) What happened before the sendings off were allowed?
4) What was the point of the Premier League coming about? It was not a new division, just replced the old division 1? Surely it would have made more sense in the Premier league being the top new division, and having 4 divisions below that, just bringing in more non league to make up the rest of div 4?
5) Where is Nigel Quashie?
-

Czech Hammer
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:49 pm
- Location: Prague / London
-
by Bend it like Repka on Tue May 29, 2012 10:41 pm
I took a load of garden waste to the dump at the weekend. Some of the ants from the garden came along for the ride in the bags.
So what happens to those ants removed from their colony? Do they
1) Die a lonely death as they depend on their own colony 2) Find a new colony and exist there 3) Live a normal lifespan alone
-

Bend it like Repka
-
- Posts: 5648
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 6:05 pm
- Location: In a synth band checking there are no guitars
by Hammers Dad on Tue May 29, 2012 10:53 pm
Czech Hammer wrote:Some football related questions:
1) Why did the governing body decide to bring in the play off system? Money
2) In the 80's for a few seasons, bottom of division played top of division below. Why was this scrapped? Much more interesting...Money
3) What happened before the sendings off were allowed? Stiff tellings off with no bubble bath after the game
4) What was the point of the Premier League coming about? It was not a new division, just replced the old division 1? Surely it would have made more sense in the Premier league being the top new division, and having 4 divisions below that, just bringing in more non league to make up the rest of div 4? Money
5) Where is Nigel Quashie? Looking for bubble bath and money
They still had sendings off etc before the cards, just nothing was shown.
-

Hammers Dad
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:37 pm
- Location: Awaiting my P45
-
by James P on Wed May 30, 2012 11:03 am
Can someone please briefly explain the intricacies of oval track racing like Nascar. I'm sure for quarter of a million people to turn up and watch there must be more to it than driving around in a circle for 200 laps but I'm damned if I can spot it.
-

James P
-
- Posts: 9643
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 12:55 pm
- Location: Romford
by sendô on Wed May 30, 2012 11:21 am
James P wrote:Can someone please briefly explain the intricacies of oval track racing like Nascar. I'm sure for quarter of a million people to turn up and watch there must be more to it than driving around in a circle for 200 laps but I'm damned if I can spot it.
I'd imagine like most endurance races it's the sheer concentration of having to go around the same two slow left hand bends 200 times without falling asleep due to sheer boredom. I wonder if they drug test people for red bull and strong black coffee just to keep it interesting?
-

sendô
-
- Posts: 14874
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:41 pm
- Location: in the pessimistically optimistic camp.
by Irish Iron on Wed May 30, 2012 4:45 pm
James P wrote:Can someone please briefly explain the intricacies of oval track racing like Nascar. I'm sure for quarter of a million people to turn up and watch there must be more to it than driving around in a circle for 200 laps but I'm damned if I can spot it.
Crashes. Lots and lots of crashes.
-

Irish Iron
-
- Posts: 3938
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:50 pm
by Cuenca 'ammer on Wed May 30, 2012 7:46 pm
Count 3 turn left count 1 turn left count 3 turn left count 1 turn left.
That's how intricate it gets.
-

Cuenca 'ammer
- ex 'ouston 'ammer
-
- Posts: 22992
- Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2002 5:19 pm
- Location: Journey to the dead of night. High on a hill in Eldorado
-
by Philosophical Dan on Wed May 30, 2012 9:06 pm
Can anyone explain Gauss's theorem to me? I never got my head around it whilst reading Electronics at university, and have still yet to get to grips with even the most basic concepts. Tried reading a few things off the interweb, but am still none the wiser. NOTE: My failure to understand Gauss's theorem does not make me an "Idiot" 
-

Philosophical Dan
- KUMB's campest cyclist
-
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 4:40 pm
- Location: 10 PRINT "Philosophical Dan is Skill! "; 20 GOTO 10
by sendô on Wed May 30, 2012 9:30 pm
"The electric flux through any closed surface is proportional to the enclosed electric charge."
My technical electrical detailed knowledge such as the above isn't as it could be, but I understand it to be that the magnetic field around a conductor will increase or decrease in proportion to the electrical charge in a closed surface.
Not really a law I've ever had to use if I'm honest.
-

sendô
-
- Posts: 14874
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:41 pm
- Location: in the pessimistically optimistic camp.
by Philosophical Dan on Wed May 30, 2012 9:40 pm
sendô wrote:"The electric flux through any closed surface is proportional to the enclosed electric charge."
My technical electrical detailed knowledge such as the above isn't as it could be, but I understand it to be that the magnetic field around a conductor will increase or decrease in proportion to the electrical charge in a closed surface.
Not really a law I've ever had to use if I'm honest.
So... the amount of flux lines bisecting a closed surface increases as the contained charge increases & decreases as the contained charge decreases? Is that right? ****ing hell, is it as simple as that?
-

Philosophical Dan
- KUMB's campest cyclist
-
- Posts: 23172
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 4:40 pm
- Location: 10 PRINT "Philosophical Dan is Skill! "; 20 GOTO 10
by orbital on Thu May 31, 2012 9:30 am
How do condensing combi boilers work, how can it be possible to turn cold water into hot instantly?
-
orbital
-
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 2:39 pm
- Location: M25 J17
-
by sendô on Thu May 31, 2012 9:38 am
Philosophical Dan wrote:So... the amount of flux lines bisecting a closed surface increases as the contained charge increases & decreases as the contained charge decreases? Is that right? ****ing hell, is it as simple as that?
That's how I understand it. Maybe there's more to it that I'm not seeing, but in my experience most laws of physics are actually quite simple once you get your head around them or what they're trying to state. Dunno, perhaps I've over simplified it but that's the way it seems.
-

sendô
-
- Posts: 14874
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 1:41 pm
- Location: in the pessimistically optimistic camp.
by shammy on Thu May 31, 2012 9:45 am
As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?
-

shammy
-
- Posts: 4400
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 10:21 am
- Location: The Hamlets of the Tower
by Burningaham on Thu May 31, 2012 10:32 am
shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?
it might be cold by now
-

Burningaham
-
- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:13 pm
- Location: watchin you, watchin us, watchin them.
by Czech Hammer on Thu May 31, 2012 11:17 am
shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?
aaaaaaaaaaaaand I am going to puzzling over that all day.
-

Czech Hammer
-
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:49 pm
- Location: Prague / London
-
by BJA1990 on Thu May 31, 2012 11:59 am
shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?
There'd be bacteria on the sandwich though. Whether it'd survive and be able to reproduce is another matter entirely.
-

BJA1990
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 8:57 pm
- Location: East Stand Upper.
-
by White Goodman on Thu May 31, 2012 12:05 pm
BJA1990 wrote: There'd be bacteria on the sandwich though. Whether it'd survive and be able to reproduce is another matter entirely.
I'm no expert but surely bacteria need oxygen to survive.
-

White Goodman
-
- Posts: 10645
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 12:50 pm
- Location: Not saving anything for the swim back
by Tsinclair on Thu May 31, 2012 1:11 pm
Why are there limits to FREEDOM of speech?
-

Tsinclair
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Location: Chadwell Heath
-
by Hammers Dad on Thu May 31, 2012 2:23 pm
shammy wrote:As there is no bacteria in Space, does this mean if Neil Armstrong left a bacon sandwich on the Moon in 1969 it would still be good to eat today?
It would seem that bacteria may be able to survive: Bacteria taken from cliffs at Beer on the South Coast have shown themselves to be hardy space travellers.
The bugs were put on the exterior of the space station to see how they would cope in the hostile conditions that exist above the Earth's atmosphere.
And when scientists inspected the microbes a year and a half later, they found many were still alive.
These survivors are now thriving in a laboratory at the Open University (OU) in Milton Keynes. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11039206
-

Hammers Dad
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:37 pm
- Location: Awaiting my P45
-
Return to The Snug
Users browsing this forum: EastLondonHammer, Google Adsense [Bot], maltab and 10 guests
|
|