West Ham Utd 0-1 Chelsea (14/03/15)
Moderator: Gnome
Online
- The Old Man of Storr
- Posts: 32999
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:17 am
- Location: Lost In the Recesses Of My Mind .
- Has liked: 2691 likes
- Total likes: 1786 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Did anyone else notice John Terry rolling away from the penalty area after his collision with Sakho ?
What a Professional .
What a Professional .
- Mega Ron
- Posts: 12447
- Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:35 pm
- Location: -.-- --- ..- / -.-. ..- -. - ...
- Has liked: 168 likes
- Total likes: 171 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Mourinho's a right c.unt.
We're the best at what we do are we. It's always a tough game here te way they put the ball into the box. The ref had a good game.
Piece of s.hit.
We're the best at what we do are we. It's always a tough game here te way they put the ball into the box. The ref had a good game.
Piece of s.hit.
- smuts
- Posts: 33937
- Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:28 am
- Location: East, East, East London
- Has liked: 1534 likes
- Total likes: 1494 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Ref had a good game.....yeah, because he gave you everything as per usual Jose. Marriner loves him.
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Had to miss this game due to the missus having an Op. Watched the hour highlights of it later on. Looked like a good game.
- Puff Daddy
- Gone for a Burton
- Posts: 42454
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:08 pm
- Location: Westham Way
- Has liked: 258 likes
- Total likes: 1161 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
No they didn't ~ They would have had no excuses had we, as we should have, won it. I have been thinking, had Andy Carroll been playing, I think we would have won, That first half chance which Sakho messed up with his right foot, when perfectly placed, right in front of goal, was perfect and on a plate for a left footer and two of those second half headers, would have found the net had Carroll been on the end of the crossesjaybs wrote:We gave it what we could, but they always had the edge.
- k-r-c
- Posts: 10601
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2004 12:56 am
- Location: Berko
- Has liked: 28 likes
- Total likes: 223 likes
- Contact:
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
You make a valid point and you would expect him to bury them, however Carroll seems to spend so much time not in the box who knows if he even would of been in the right positions.Puff Daddy wrote:
No they didn't ~ They would have had no excuses had we, as we should have, won it. I have been thinking, had Andy Carroll been playing, I think we would have won, That first half chance which Sakho messed up with his right foot, when perfectly placed, right in front of goal, was perfect and on a plate for a left footer and two of those second half headers, would have found the net had Carroll been on the end of the crosses
-
- Posts: 26538
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:31 am
- Location: Forest Gate
- Has liked: 144 likes
- Total likes: 2406 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
We had a couple of decent chances for sure, but let's be fair, they had some very very clear cut ones as well. It would be pushing it IMHO to say we deserved to win. A draw, yesNo they didn't ~ They would have had no excuses had we, as we should have, won it.
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
If we play like that against woolwich wanderers I think we'll get something. Collins didn't have a great game but he got chucked on at a difficult time. Nolan was immense yesterday and deserves to keep his place, let Song fight for it back. Everybody else played a blinder too, we just didn't get the rub of the green.
- china hammer
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:40 am
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
After a morning thinking about last nights game, I f**king hate John Terry!
- The Sherriff
- Posts: 2425
- Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:31 pm
- Location: South Twyford
- Has liked: 6 likes
- Total likes: 106 likes
- Contact:
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
And they have the audacity to claim the officials have an agenda against them?
Chelsea have benefited from suspicious/inconsistent decisions more than most – yet the ‘Spiteful One’ uses selective statistics and conveniently forgets the numerous times this has happened, preferring to claim they’ve been hard done by.
We’ve had more than our fair share of them this season yet I don’t recall anyone from the club claiming the ref’s are out to get us.
Its insufferable watching the media hanging off every word Jose says … despite his inaccuracies, he’s never questioned or pulled up over it. His claims are without any foundation or substance, quite frankly laughable that he gets away with such accusations.
If the boot was on the other foot last night, they would have been claiming an agenda
****ers football club with a vile human being as their manager.
Chelsea have benefited from suspicious/inconsistent decisions more than most – yet the ‘Spiteful One’ uses selective statistics and conveniently forgets the numerous times this has happened, preferring to claim they’ve been hard done by.
We’ve had more than our fair share of them this season yet I don’t recall anyone from the club claiming the ref’s are out to get us.
Its insufferable watching the media hanging off every word Jose says … despite his inaccuracies, he’s never questioned or pulled up over it. His claims are without any foundation or substance, quite frankly laughable that he gets away with such accusations.
If the boot was on the other foot last night, they would have been claiming an agenda
****ers football club with a vile human being as their manager.
- miles
- This site...
- Posts: 4509
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 4:56 am
- Has liked: 322 likes
- Total likes: 421 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Downing was mustard down the left in the second half. Left footed player out on the left wing swinging crosses in with his left foot. We might be on to something here.
- Harry Hound
- Posts: 4020
- Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:25 pm
- Location: "If you don't know the game, then you're still part of it"
- Has liked: 67 likes
- Total likes: 10 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
He's a great goal sniffer but for me the main concern with Sakho is that he appears to be too one footed.Puff Daddy wrote:]We gave it what we could, but they always had the edge.
No they didn't ~ They would have had no excuses had we, as we should have, won it. I have been thinking, had Andy Carroll been playing, I think we would have won, That first half chance which Sakho messed up with his right foot, when perfectly placed, right in front of goal, was perfect and on a plate for a left footer and two of those second half headers, would have found the net had Carroll been on the end of the crosses
-
- Posts: 879
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:37 am
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Most of us got to that point several years ago.china hammer wrote:After a morning thinking about last nights game, I f**king hate John Terry!
- The Gibbins
- Maggot infested twat
- Posts: 23513
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Living in Perception
- Total likes: 10 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
If the injury time was accurately recorded in both halves i think we would have been there all night. Kurt Zouma took a good bloody 4 hours to limp off with a fake injury in the first half, Azpilcueta laid down injured for no reason after some West Ham pressure, Courtois was given all the time in the world by the referee and the subs were not hurried along at all when going off.
In fact Diego Costa was right by the touchline and still took a good 30-40 seconds to get off the pitch. Its really not hard for a referee to tell an athlete to jog off the pitch or they will be booked..... he had no backbone yesterday.
Its modern day football, but Chelsea are by far the most unprofessional team in the league. The two subs within 10 seconds in injury time was an absolute piss take, things like that need need to be addressed by the authorities. Managers should not be allowed to make a sub and then another one within seconds... its clever from Mourinho, he knows how to kill a game and that's exactly what he did.
In fact Diego Costa was right by the touchline and still took a good 30-40 seconds to get off the pitch. Its really not hard for a referee to tell an athlete to jog off the pitch or they will be booked..... he had no backbone yesterday.
Its modern day football, but Chelsea are by far the most unprofessional team in the league. The two subs within 10 seconds in injury time was an absolute piss take, things like that need need to be addressed by the authorities. Managers should not be allowed to make a sub and then another one within seconds... its clever from Mourinho, he knows how to kill a game and that's exactly what he did.
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
All in all I was very proud of our performance. Disappointed to be 10th, hope we can climb back up the table.
At least we bounced back performance wise from Palarse. Onwards and upwards. Great atmosphere in Upper East Stand
At least we bounced back performance wise from Palarse. Onwards and upwards. Great atmosphere in Upper East Stand
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
What really killed our chances in the second half was Kouyate being clattered by Terry...we were really pushing for an equaliser up until then, and the 6 or so minute delay put paid to that...
If only he hadn't led with his face....Terry's a piece of work though, stepping across Kouyate and knowing exactly what was going to happen, what a ****
If only he hadn't led with his face....Terry's a piece of work though, stepping across Kouyate and knowing exactly what was going to happen, what a ****
- Yea Why Not
- Posts: 16954
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 1:49 pm
- Location: Chips & Gravy you say? Well you can shove that up your ass
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Yep, his best game this year for sure. Against perhaps the best right back in the league toomiles wrote:Downing was mustard down the left in the second half. Left footed player out on the left wing swinging crosses in with his left foot. We might be on to something here.
- Westbourne Bill
- Posts: 7483
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 5:49 pm
- Location: W Sussex
- Has liked: 130 likes
- Total likes: 332 likes
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Hazard, Terry, Mourinhno....they make it far too easy to dislike Chelsea.
Cracking game though.
Cracking game though.
- Burnley Hammer
- Posts: 16497
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:19 pm
- Location: was Colne, Burnley, Hull, Colchester, Norwich, Derby.... Now Nottingham
- Has liked: 236 likes
- Total likes: 2575 likes
- Contact:
Re: West Ham Utd v Chelsea: match thread
Easy to say that but all strikers have off days, including Carroll. He may have scored them or he may have fluffed them all too. We'll never know.Puff Daddy wrote:
No they didn't ~ They would have had no excuses had we, as we should have, won it. I have been thinking, had Andy Carroll been playing, I think we would have won, That first half chance which Sakho messed up with his right foot, when perfectly placed, right in front of goal, was perfect and on a plate for a left footer and two of those second half headers, would have found the net had Carroll been on the end of the crosses